In response to:

The Senate's Big Cloture Vote

/ Wrote: Nov 12, 2009 4:16 PM
Once again, this is an example of the folly in using static tax analysis for public policy, perhaps especially on capital-gains tax rates. Democrats in 1986 — and now — assume that hiking the CGT rate by 69% will produce 69% more revenue that what was received at the old rates. That doesn’t take into account market behavior after tax conditions change. A capital-gains tax hike will push investors to cash out before it hits, and then shelter their assets rather than putting them to work. After all, at a CGT rate of 25.4%, they would probably pay less tax by getting interest off of their cash than by assuming the risk of losses and paying higher tax rates on the gains.

During the presidential campaign, Barack Obama stumbled when he...

Next week the Democrats' leader in the United States Senate, Harry Reid, is going to try and open debate on Obamacare.  The switchboard at the Senate --202-224-3121-- should be ringing non-stop as a result.

The motion Reid will offer to open debate on the bill requires 60 votes to succeed.  Thus far no Republican has indicated a willingness to vote yes, so every single Democrat will have to agree to move the monstrosity forward.  When they do, each and every Democrat will forever "own" whatever comes out the other end of the legislative sausage factory.

This first cloture vote should thus weigh...