In response to:

Gay Marriage Myths and Truth

/ Wrote: Aug 19, 2010 7:47 PM
BS, Cammie. You can't do your own work so you take mine and twist it to suit your own needs. If Ellen and Anne got 'married' in Des Moines and moved to Tacoma, they could enter into a domestic partnership (FOR THE FINAL TIME - WA DOESN'T HAVE CUs), but they would not have the right of having their marriage recognised in WA, which FF& C allows a opposite sex couple married in Des Moines, who moves to Tacoma, to have their marriage recognised. NJ will not recognise SSM from Massachusetts. A$shole, I don't get excited about marriage because it was the worst time of my life. My happiest day was when I divorced the SOB. Most people do not feel that way about marriage and they should be allowed to get MARRIED, not civil unionised or...

The decision by federal judge Vaughan Walker to invalidate California’s Proposition 8 both recycles and revives some of the tired, misleading clichés regarding the same sex marriage controversy. These distortions demand direct, concise correction and rebuttal.

1. “Proposition 8 was a mean-spirited ban on gay marriage.”

TRUTH: Proposition 8 banned nothing. The ubiquitous headlines describing this voter-mandated change in the California constitution as a “gay marriage ban” amount to the worst example of journalistic malpractice in recent years. The entire proposition consisted of only fourteen words: “Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.” This...

Friday, June 01 | 10:35 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 10:35 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 10:35 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 10:35 AM ET