By Aaron Maasho
ADDIS ABABA (Reuters) - African leaders said on Monday they would immediately create a military rapid reaction force to deal with regional coups, rebellions and wars, seeking to reduce the continent's reliance on foreign troops and funds for its defense.
African Union (AU) Chairman and Ethiopian Prime Minister Hailemariam Desalegn announced the creation of the so-called African Capacity for Immediate Response to Crises, and said South African President Jacob Zuma had proposed the force.
Besides South Africa, which in March had more than a dozen soldiers killed in Central African Republic by coup rebels, Uganda and Ethiopia have also pledged to contribute to the new contingent, officials said at an AU summit in Addis Ababa.
"Many countries have volunteered to contribute so that anything that happens in Africa, including an unconstitutional change of government, should be averted. This will be taken very seriously," Hailemariam told reporters after the decision.
Security challenges faced by the AU over the past two years have included coups in Guinea-Bissau and Mali, offensives by Islamist militant groups in Mali and Nigeria, and conflict involving rebels in eastern Congo and Central African Republic.
In Mali, former colonial power France rushed in troops and planes this year to block an advance by Islamist jihadists, an intervention that embarrassed the AU by showing up the continent's lack of defensive capability.
The African Union is celebrating 50 years since the creation of its precursor, the Organisation of African Unity, a largely toothless regional body that was often criticized for failing to act against genocides, coups and civil wars.
The decade-old AU has a more active policy and had drawn up plans for an African Standby Force. But delays in its creation had led to criticism it was slow to do its own peacekeeping, relying instead on the United Nations and Western donors.
The text of the AU Assembly decision said the rapid response force would be formed from voluntary contributions of troops, funds and equipment by member states in a position to do so.
It would be a stop-gap measure pending the formation of the fully-fledged Standby Force, a planned 5,000-strong AU contingent slated to be operational by 2015, although AU officials have said this target is not likely to be achieved.
The immediate response force being created would be a "flexible and robust force ... to be deployed very rapidly to effectively respond to emergency situations", the text said.
It was not clear how big the force would be, as that would depend upon what voluntary contributions were made.
AU Peace and Security Commissioner Ramtane Lamamra said "constitutional crises" - the diplomatic term for coups - and "massive violations of human rights" were the kind of emergencies the new force would be expected to tackle.
The decision was "aimed at helping in bringing about African solutions to Africa's problems", the decision text said.
FUNDING WILL BE CRUCIAL
Some experts questioned just how quickly the new force could be operational, given the years of delays that have dogged the larger African Standby Force.
"On the surface it sounds nice, but I think it raises more questions than answers," Emmanuel Kwesi Aning, head of research at the Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre in Accra, Ghana, told Reuters. "The bottom line is: where is the money going to come from?" he said.
U.N. peacekeeping missions in Congo and in Sudan's Darfur, which already involve African troops, are each costing global taxpayers well over $1 billion a year.
More than 90 percent of the AU's peace and security efforts, including its AMISOM mission in Somalia, are funded by external actors such as the European Union and United States.
Asked about financing for the new force, the AU's Lamamra said the individual countries supplying troops and equipment would be responsible for paying for these deployments.
"We are not going to take it from the AU budget. We are not going to ask for partners to fund the operations of this. This is a new thing," he said.
Aning questioned how many African countries apart from continental powers South Africa and Nigeria - the latter already fighting a major insurgency by violent Islamist sect Boko Haram - would be able to make significant contributions.
(Writing by Pascal Fletcher; Editing by Pravin Char)
The Threat to the Scientific Method that Explains the Spate of Fraudulent Science Publications | Calvin Beisner