By Lawrence Hurley
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to consider a challenge to a Massachusetts law that ensures access for patients at clinics that offer abortions.
Anti-abortion protesters challenged the law, saying it violated their constitutional rights, including their right to freedom of speech, by preventing them from standing on the sidewalk and speaking to those entering clinics.
The case concerns a 2007 law that amended an existing statute that restricted conduct outside abortion clinics by introducing a blanket 35-feet (11-meter) no-entry zone that only allowed patients, staff, passers-by and emergency services to enter.
The protesters say the exemption makes the law unconstitutional under the free speech guarantees of the First Amendment because the government is choosing one set of beliefs over another.
Lawyers for the state of Massachusetts dismissed that claim, saying the law was enacted purely to deal with a potential public safety problem.
Oral arguments and a ruling are expected in the court's next term, which begins in October and ends in June 2014.
The case is McCullen v. Coakley, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 12-1168.
(Corrects unit of measurement in third paragraph)
(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Howard Goller, Will Dunham and Bill Trott)
Planned Parenthood hires forensic analysis firm to debunk 'heavily edited' undercover videos
Small But Honest Columnist Again Forced to Correct Highest-Rated Show on Cable TV | Human Events
Panicky Democratic donors wonder: Are we really going to bet the White House on this shady loser? - Hot Air
Vox "Smart Take" Pushes Gun Confiscation. Here's What Would Happen If They Tried. - Bearing Arms - 2nd Amendment, Gun Confiscation
RIP, the Jeb Bush 2016 Campaign | RedState
Katie Pavlich - Hillary: My Republican Opponents Treat Women Just Like Terrorists Do
Night Watch - Japan Might Finally Be Ready to Join the War on Terror