WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on Friday asked a U.S. appeals court to rehear a case in which a three-judge panel struck down a rule that would reduce harmful emissions from coal-burning power plants.
The EPA filed an "en banc" petition in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, which in August ruled 2-1 to suspend the agency's cross state air pollution rule and ordered it rewritten.
The EPA rule targeted sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions from power plants, ensuring that emissions in one state do not travel downwind to increase pollution in neighboring states.
Two of the three judges ruling on the case said the EPA had exceeded its "jurisdictional limits" in interpreting the Clean Air Act and imposed "massive emission reduction requirements" on upwind states.
In its petition for the hearing by the full circuit, the EPA argued that the three-judge panel's decision was "inconsistent" with the court's previous rulings and that it did not exceed its mandate under the Clean Air Act.
"The Act assigns specific roles to EPA and the States and creates an orderly process for them, a process the panel's decision completely upends," the EPA said.
(Reporting by Valerie Volcovici; Editing by Leslie Gevirtz)
Concealed Carry: What To Do When Stopped By The Police - Bearing Arms - Concealed Cary, Video
Revealed: Hillary Clinton made the first move with Bill
John Hawkins - 15 Excerpts That Show How Radical, Weird And Out of Touch College Campuses Have Become
- What Is Your U.S. Income Percentile Ranking?
George Soros: Top 10 Reasons He Is Dangerous | Human Events
How did the FBI manage to “lose” Sharyl Attkisson’s file?
The Myth of "4 Million Conservative Voters Stayed Home in 2012" | RedState