(Reuters) - A U.S. federal judge ruled on Thursday that Delaware's Court of Chancery cannot hold arbitration hearings before a sitting judge that are closed to the public, according to court documents.
The court's five judges were sued by the Delaware Coalition for Open Government, a group that promotes government transparency, for holding what the group said amounted to "secret" hearings to settle large business disputes.
The federal judge hearing the case, Mary McLaughlin of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, ruled that the arbitration cases cannot be closed to the public.
"The court concludes that the Delaware proceeding functions essentially as a non-jury trial before a Chancery Court judge," wrote "Because it is a civil trial there is a qualified right of access and this proceeding must be open to the public."
(Reporting By Tom Hals in Wilmington, Del.; Editing by Steve Orlofsky)
Ann Coulter - Small But Honest Columnist Again Forced to Correct Highest-Rated Show on Cable TV
Vox "Smart Take" Pushes Gun Confiscation. Here's What Would Happen If They Tried. - Bearing Arms - 2nd Amendment, Gun Confiscation
Political Calculations - How Do Stock Buybacks Affect Market Indices?
Saudi Arabia: The World’s Greatest Hypocrite | Human Events
Boom! Obama gets devastating reminder after blasting New Orleans' longtime 'structural inequality'
Boehner reportedly tells Colorado donors: Ted Cruz is a “jackass” - Hot Air
Republican Party, R.I.P. (1854 - 2016) | RedState