(Reuters) - A U.S. federal judge ruled on Thursday that Delaware's Court of Chancery cannot hold arbitration hearings before a sitting judge that are closed to the public, according to court documents.
The court's five judges were sued by the Delaware Coalition for Open Government, a group that promotes government transparency, for holding what the group said amounted to "secret" hearings to settle large business disputes.
The federal judge hearing the case, Mary McLaughlin of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, ruled that the arbitration cases cannot be closed to the public.
"The court concludes that the Delaware proceeding functions essentially as a non-jury trial before a Chancery Court judge," wrote "Because it is a civil trial there is a qualified right of access and this proceeding must be open to the public."
(Reporting By Tom Hals in Wilmington, Del.; Editing by Steve Orlofsky)
If They Won't Fight, Destroy Them | RedState
Staffer who handled Hillary Clinton's private email to plead the Fifth Amendment
Megyn Kelly gets angry: Why don’t the left’s “civility” rules apply to Black Lives Matter protesters? - Hot Air
FATAL SELFIE: Teen Killed Taking Instagram Photo With Gun To His Head - Bearing Arms - Negligent Discharge, Texas
Ann Coulter - How To Write A New York Times Op-Ed In Three Easy Steps
How to Write a New York Times Op-Ed in Three Easy Steps | Human Events
Dave Ramsey - Dear Dave: Going to Extremes Is Unhealthy