Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS   LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Tuesday, May 20, 2008
Judge hears arguments over records in Yahoo lawsuit
By RANDALL CHASE
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Do you personally know a young voter who has been sucked into Obamamania?


Lawyers on both sides of a shareholder lawsuit over Yahoo Inc.'s board's handling of Microsoft's $47.5 billion takeover offer are accusing one another of turning it into a public relations battle.

A Delaware judge weighing the shareholders' request to make their complaint against the company public held a private phone conference with lawyers for Sunnyvale, Calif.-based Yahoo and dissident shareholders Tuesday morning.

Plaintiffs' attorney Joel Friedlander wrote in a letter to Chancellor William Chandler III last week that Internet pioneer Yahoo is trying to "whitewash embarrassing documents" it believes will damage the board's efforts to repel a proxy fight by activist investor Carl Icahn.

The two sides will submit additional arguments this week and next, and the judge will rule after that, Friedlander said Tuesday.

Much of the information the defendants want to keep secret, according to Friedlander, involves employee severance plans that Yahoo adopted shortly after software maker Microsoft Corp. made its initial bid on Jan. 31.

Adoption of the severance plans was an "unreasonable defensive measure" that breached the board's fiduciary duty to maximize value for Yahoo shareholders, the plaintiffs claim.

Icahn has nominated an alternate slate of candidates to oppose Yahoo's 10 current directors, including Chief Executive Jerry Yang, at Yahoo's July 3 annual meeting.

In another letter sent to Chandler just prior to Tuesday's teleconference, Friedlander said Yahoo is ignoring constitutional and common-law standards for the sealing of public judicial records. The company has offered no factual justification for redacting 24 paragraphs of the complaint, portions of 12 other paragraphs, and all six exhibits, he added. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.