WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court says there can be no retroactive application of its ruling that lawyers have to tell their clients if pleading guilty to a crime could cause their deportation.
The high court's 7-2 ruling came Wednesday in the case of Roselva Chaidez.
The Supreme Court ruled in 2010 that immigrants have a constitutional right to be told by their lawyers whether pleading guilty to a crime could lead to their deportation. Chaidez had already been convicted for mail fraud and was in a deportation proceeding. She then asked the courts to allow her to take advantage of the new ruling.
Justice Elena Kagan wrote that the 2010 ruling was a new rule, so it doesn't apply to convictions that came before. Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented.
Meryl Streep just solved the #OscarsSoWhite dilemma in one sentence
New Jersey Man Slays Child | Human Events
Marco Rubio Looks To A Brokered Convention For the Nomination | RedState
Ann Coulter - New Jersey Man Slays Child
GM Fires Concealed Carrying Valet Who Saved Autoworker Under Attack
State Department: Yeah, exposing top-secret info on unsecured e-mail chains is “a serious matter”
Political Calculations - Gasoline Prices, Minimum Wage Hikes Define Trends for California's New Jobless Claims