WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court says there can be no retroactive application of its ruling that lawyers have to tell their clients if pleading guilty to a crime could cause their deportation.
The high court's 7-2 ruling came Wednesday in the case of Roselva Chaidez.
The Supreme Court ruled in 2010 that immigrants have a constitutional right to be told by their lawyers whether pleading guilty to a crime could lead to their deportation. Chaidez had already been convicted for mail fraud and was in a deportation proceeding. She then asked the courts to allow her to take advantage of the new ruling.
Justice Elena Kagan wrote that the 2010 ruling was a new rule, so it doesn't apply to convictions that came before. Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented.
Michael Schaus - Dem Rep: We're Not Broke; Gov't Just Doesn't Have Your Money...Yet
Katie Pavlich - WATCH: Sheriff David Clarke Takes on Cop Killer Advocate on CNN
President Obama, Commute Sharanda Jones' Sentence | RedState
'More playful than anything': #BlackFair participant puts 'Pigs in a blanket' chant 'in context'
The Federalist: Smoking guns in latest Hillary e-mail release? Update: Another? - Hot Air
Elon Musk’s Crony Capitalism under Scrutiny | Human Events
10mm Underwood Extreme Penetrators Vs Bulletproof Glass - Bearing Arms - 10mm, Underwood, Video