WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court says there can be no retroactive application of its ruling that lawyers have to tell their clients if pleading guilty to a crime could cause their deportation.
The high court's 7-2 ruling came Wednesday in the case of Roselva Chaidez.
The Supreme Court ruled in 2010 that immigrants have a constitutional right to be told by their lawyers whether pleading guilty to a crime could lead to their deportation. Chaidez had already been convicted for mail fraud and was in a deportation proceeding. She then asked the courts to allow her to take advantage of the new ruling.
Justice Elena Kagan wrote that the 2010 ruling was a new rule, so it doesn't apply to convictions that came before. Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented.
Mike Shedlock - Europe Fears Bail-Ins: Capital Flight Intensifies in Italy, France, Spain; Are German Banks Safe?
Tonight's New Hampshire GOP Debate Preview | RedState
America is a Nation Headed For a Fall
Reporter to Trump: Can we expect more “forward motion” on equality for gays when you’re president?
Here are 15 of Eric Boehlert's comically wrong tweets about Iowa
Why Muslim Rapists Prefer Blondes: A History | Human Events
Concealed Carrier Thwarts Possible Mass Shooting in NOLA