WASHINGTON (AP) — Appeals court judges reviewing the conviction of former lobbyist Kevin Ring in the Abramoff scandal are questioning whether evidence of campaign contributions should have been allowed at his trial.
Ring, who worked under superlobbyist Jack Abramoff, was sentenced to 20 months in prison for giving meals and event tickets to public officials. The trial judge allowed evidence of legal campaign contributions, which prosecutors said showed how Ring gained access to public officials. But the judge also told jurors they could not consider the contributions as part of the "illegal stream of benefits" Ring was charged with providing officials.
Judge David S. Tatel said the campaign contributions were of some value in making the case. But he also questioned whether that was outweighed by the prejudicial or confusing effect to jurors.
New Jersey's Gun Laws Strike Again!
The Biggest Winner from New Hampshire Was Hillary Clinton | RedState
Mike Shedlock - Obama Slashes Four Hours Off Definition of "Full-Time" Employment
Sloppy Language and Thinking
Sloppy Language and Thinking | Human Events
Is Cruz the frontrunner now?
Hillary Clinton and Madeleine Albright will NOT like the 'best headline of the morning'