Arizona is entitled to demand that people present identification before being allowed to cast a ballot, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday.
In a split decision, the judges rejected arguments that mandating would-be voters show a driver's license or other identification unfairly discriminates against Latino voters. Judge Sandra Ikuta, writing for the majority, said while challengers made that claim, they failed to present any credible evidence.
The court also brushed aside arguments that the requirement to provide identification, approved by voters in 2004, amounts to a poll tax.
Legal Community Mourns Passing Of Justice Scalia, ‘One Of The Greatest Justices Our Country Has Known’ | Matt Vespa
MAGNETIC BUCKSHOT- Unexpected Results! - [VIDEO]
New Jersey Man Slays Child | Human Events
- The Major Trends in U.S. Income Inequality Since 1947
The Craziest GOP Debate of The Cycle: Trump Defends Planned Parenthood, Cruz and Rubio Spar, Audience Boos
The dominant player at the GOP debate was… the audience
'Who signed off on this?' Today's 'disgraceful' WaPo headline about Scalia 'tells you everything'
Trump Was the Biggest Loser during the South Carolina Debate | RedState