WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal appeals court says that a Johnson & Johnson heart stent does not infringe a patent held by a doctor and inventor, overturning a $482 million decision against the company.
The three-judge panel said a lower court misinterpreted the company's patent and should not have ruled in favor of Bruce Saffran, a doctor from Princeton, N.J.
Heart stents are mesh-wire tubes that prop open arteries affected by coronary artery disease. The dispute centered over drug-eluting stents, which release a drug to help keep arteries from clogging.
Saffran sued J&J in 2007 saying its Cypher stents infringed on his 1997 patent covering technology to deliver medication inside the body. A Texas jury ruled in Saffran's favor in 2011, concluding J&J had willfully infringed on his patent.
Man Dies Attempting Appendix Carry Reholster In Milkwaukee - Bearing Arms - appendix carry, Milwaukee, Negligent Discharge, Timothy Phonisay, Wisconsin
'Scary as hell': Pens featuring Hillary Clinton's cackling head spreading by postal mail
George Soros: Top 10 Reasons He Is Dangerous | Human Events
Sheriff’s deputy executed in Texas Update: And now we have a suspect in custody - Hot Air
DNC trying to insulate itself from Iran disaster. Or maybe just Debbie Wasserman Schultz is. | RedState
Nick Adams - Not a Single Illegal Immigrant in 7 Months... In Australia
Doug Giles - DEAR WHINERS: Read THIS Before You Kill A Reporter On Live TV