North Carolina Senate

County Results
County Candidate Votes % Won
Alamance
0%
Richard Burr 30,614 56.8%
Erskine Bowles 22,580 41.9%
Tom Bailey 718 1.3%
Alexander
0%
Richard Burr 10,073 64.1%
Erskine Bowles 5,430 34.5%
Tom Bailey 222 1.4%
Alleghany
0%
Richard Burr 2,754 58.3%
Erskine Bowles 1,908 40.4%
Tom Bailey 65 1.4%
Anson
0%
Erskine Bowles 5,734 62.4%
Richard Burr 3,367 36.6%
Tom Bailey 92 1%
Ashe
0%
Richard Burr 7,021 59.3%
Erskine Bowles 4,651 39.3%
Tom Bailey 174 1.5%
Avery
0%
Richard Burr 5,157 71.3%
Erskine Bowles 1,917 26.5%
Tom Bailey 162 2.2%
Beaufort
0%
Richard Burr 11,109 56.5%
Erskine Bowles 8,231 41.9%
Tom Bailey 306 1.6%
Bertie
0%
Erskine Bowles 5,227 66%
Richard Burr 2,640 33.3%
Tom Bailey 54 0.7%
Bladen
0%
Erskine Bowles 6,661 56.1%
Richard Burr 5,073 42.7%
Tom Bailey 143 1.2%
Brunswick
0%
Richard Burr 20,554 55.1%
Erskine Bowles 16,128 43.2%
Tom Bailey 623 1.7%
Buncombe
0%
Erskine Bowles 51,745 51.4%
Richard Burr 46,763 46.5%
Tom Bailey 2,123 2.1%
Burke
0%
Richard Burr 18,371 57.3%
Erskine Bowles 13,137 40.9%
Tom Bailey 577 1.8%
Cabarrus
0%
Richard Burr 37,494 61.7%
Erskine Bowles 22,206 36.5%
Tom Bailey 1,068 1.8%
Caldwell
0%
Richard Burr 19,612 62.7%
Erskine Bowles 11,079 35.4%
Tom Bailey 577 1.8%
Camden
0%
Richard Burr 2,083 56%
Erskine Bowles 1,576 42.4%
Tom Bailey 62 1.7%
Carteret
0%
Richard Burr 16,082 63.3%
Erskine Bowles 8,875 34.9%
Tom Bailey 451 1.8%
Caswell
0%
Erskine Bowles 4,737 50.4%
Richard Burr 4,559 48.5%
Tom Bailey 104 1.1%
Catawba
0%
Richard Burr 35,946 63.1%
Erskine Bowles 20,153 35.4%
Tom Bailey 841 1.5%
Chatham
0%
Erskine Bowles 13,601 52.8%
Richard Burr 11,816 45.9%
Tom Bailey 334 1.3%
Cherokee
0%
Richard Burr 6,426 60.9%
Erskine Bowles 3,966 37.6%
Tom Bailey 156 1.5%
Chowan
0%
Erskine Bowles 2,638 50.9%
Richard Burr 2,457 47.4%
Tom Bailey 90 1.7%
Clay
0%
Richard Burr 2,896 61.1%
Erskine Bowles 1,749 36.9%
Tom Bailey 98 2.1%
Cleveland
0%
Richard Burr 20,324 54.6%
Erskine Bowles 16,342 43.9%
Tom Bailey 534 1.4%
Columbus
0%
Erskine Bowles 11,860 56.8%
Richard Burr 8,721 41.8%
Tom Bailey 282 1.4%
Craven
0%
Richard Burr 21,402 57.4%
Erskine Bowles 15,299 41%
Tom Bailey 589 1.6%
Cumberland
0%
Erskine Bowles 50,097 52.4%
Richard Burr 44,145 46.2%
Tom Bailey 1,331 1.4%
Currituck
0%
Richard Burr 5,007 59.7%
Erskine Bowles 3,172 37.8%
Tom Bailey 212 2.5%
Dare
0%
Richard Burr 8,215 52.7%
Erskine Bowles 6,995 44.8%
Tom Bailey 391 2.5%
Davidson
0%
Richard Burr 38,913 65.5%
Erskine Bowles 19,530 32.9%
Tom Bailey 952 1.6%
Davie
0%
Richard Burr 11,861 71.4%
Erskine Bowles 4,505 27.1%
Tom Bailey 238 1.4%
Duplin
0%
Richard Burr 8,613 52%
Erskine Bowles 7,768 46.9%
Tom Bailey 192 1.2%
Durham
0%
Erskine Bowles 76,294 69.5%
Richard Burr 32,217 29.4%
Tom Bailey 1,207 1.1%
Edgecombe
0%
Erskine Bowles 13,822 65.5%
Richard Burr 7,072 33.5%
Tom Bailey 195 0.9%
Forsyth
0%
Richard Burr 74,108 53.1%
Erskine Bowles 63,899 45.8%
Tom Bailey 1,460 1%
Franklin
0%
Richard Burr 10,421 49.8%
Erskine Bowles 10,197 48.8%
Tom Bailey 296 1.4%
Gaston
0%
Richard Burr 39,857 62.6%
Erskine Bowles 22,750 35.7%
Tom Bailey 1,093 1.7%
Gates
0%
Erskine Bowles 2,352 57.9%
Richard Burr 1,654 40.7%
Tom Bailey 53 1.3%
Graham
0%
Richard Burr 2,267 60.1%
Erskine Bowles 1,445 38.3%
Tom Bailey 62 1.6%
Granville
0%
Erskine Bowles 9,806 53.1%
Richard Burr 8,447 45.7%
Tom Bailey 215 1.2%
Greene
0%
Richard Burr 3,400 52.4%
Erskine Bowles 3,043 46.9%
Tom Bailey 49 0.8%
Guilford
0%
Erskine Bowles 106,315 53.5%
Richard Burr 89,926 45.3%
Tom Bailey 2,373 1.2%
Halifax
0%
Erskine Bowles 12,457 63.1%
Richard Burr 7,110 36%
Tom Bailey 164 0.8%
Harnett
0%
Richard Burr 18,501 57.2%
Erskine Bowles 13,417 41.5%
Tom Bailey 447 1.4%
Haywood
0%
Richard Burr 12,949 49.5%
Erskine Bowles 12,710 48.6%
Tom Bailey 482 1.8%
Henderson
0%
Richard Burr 25,430 61.1%
Erskine Bowles 15,652 37.6%
Tom Bailey 552 1.3%
Hertford
0%
Erskine Bowles 5,428 68%
Richard Burr 2,478 31%
Tom Bailey 80 1%
Hoke
0%
Erskine Bowles 6,271 57.5%
Richard Burr 4,431 40.6%
Tom Bailey 199 1.8%
Hyde
0%
Erskine Bowles 1,118 50.7%
Richard Burr 1,060 48.1%
Tom Bailey 28 1.3%
Iredell
0%
Richard Burr 35,600 62.5%
Erskine Bowles 20,402 35.8%
Tom Bailey 933 1.6%
Jackson
0%
Erskine Bowles 7,220 51.2%
Richard Burr 6,656 47.2%
Tom Bailey 228 1.6%
Johnston
0%
Richard Burr 33,334 61.9%
Erskine Bowles 19,966 37.1%
Tom Bailey 576 1.1%
Jones
0%
Richard Burr 2,392 52.7%
Erskine Bowles 2,092 46.1%
Tom Bailey 52 1.1%
Lee
0%
Richard Burr 10,218 52.7%
Erskine Bowles 8,900 45.9%
Tom Bailey 253 1.3%
Lenoir
0%
Richard Burr 11,707 51.2%
Erskine Bowles 11,012 48.2%
Tom Bailey 145 0.6%
Lincoln
0%
Richard Burr 18,422 62.2%
Erskine Bowles 10,657 36%
Tom Bailey 556 1.9%
Macon
0%
Richard Burr 8,399 58.1%
Erskine Bowles 5,896 40.8%
Tom Bailey 159 1.1%
Madison
0%
Richard Burr 4,490 49.2%
Erskine Bowles 4,479 49.1%
Tom Bailey 149 1.6%
Martin
0%
Erskine Bowles 5,779 55.1%
Richard Burr 4,615 44%
Tom Bailey 98 0.9%
McDowell
0%
Richard Burr 9,366 59.2%
Erskine Bowles 6,179 39.1%
Tom Bailey 270 1.7%
Mecklenburg
0%
Erskine Bowles 173,964 54.4%
Richard Burr 141,653 44.3%
Tom Bailey 4,105 1.3%
Mitchell
0%
Richard Burr 5,340 69.4%
Erskine Bowles 2,208 28.7%
Tom Bailey 141 1.8%
Montgomery
0%
Richard Burr 5,234 52%
Erskine Bowles 4,693 46.6%
Tom Bailey 145 1.4%
Moore
0%
Richard Burr 22,522 59.9%
Erskine Bowles 14,708 39.1%
Tom Bailey 360 1%
Nash
0%
Richard Burr 19,985 52.7%
Erskine Bowles 17,611 46.4%
Tom Bailey 332 0.9%
New Hanover
0%
Richard Burr 41,231 52.1%
Erskine Bowles 36,218 45.8%
Tom Bailey 1,639 2.1%
Northampton
0%
Erskine Bowles 5,861 66.9%
Richard Burr 2,822 32.2%
Tom Bailey 73 0.8%
Onslow
0%
Richard Burr 22,790 63.2%
Erskine Bowles 12,542 34.8%
Tom Bailey 756 2.1%
Orange
0%
Erskine Bowles 43,476 67.8%
Richard Burr 19,797 30.9%
Tom Bailey 846 1.3%
Pamlico
0%
Richard Burr 3,326 55.3%
Erskine Bowles 2,605 43.3%
Tom Bailey 83 1.4%
Pasquotank
0%
Erskine Bowles 7,426 55.9%
Richard Burr 5,669 42.7%
Tom Bailey 184 1.4%
Pender
0%
Richard Burr 9,182 54.6%
Erskine Bowles 7,390 43.9%
Tom Bailey 252 1.5%
Perquimans
0%
Richard Burr 2,566 52.7%
Erskine Bowles 2,242 46%
Tom Bailey 64 1.3%
Person
0%
Richard Burr 8,212 54.4%
Erskine Bowles 6,701 44.4%
Tom Bailey 185 1.2%
Pitt
0%
Richard Burr 26,489 50.1%
Erskine Bowles 26,019 49.2%
Tom Bailey 400 0.8%
Polk
0%
Richard Burr 4,825 52.7%
Erskine Bowles 4,169 45.5%
Tom Bailey 159 1.7%
Randolph
0%
Richard Burr 35,495 68.9%
Erskine Bowles 15,199 29.5%
Tom Bailey 792 1.5%
Richmond
0%
Erskine Bowles 9,221 57.2%
Richard Burr 6,574 40.8%
Tom Bailey 334 2.1%
Robeson
0%
Erskine Bowles 20,896 60.7%
Richard Burr 13,025 37.9%
Tom Bailey 489 1.4%
Rockingham
0%
Richard Burr 21,224 57.1%
Erskine Bowles 15,435 41.5%
Tom Bailey 523 1.4%
Rowan
0%
Richard Burr 31,998 62.1%
Erskine Bowles 18,543 36%
Tom Bailey 1,011 2%
Rutherford
0%
Richard Burr 14,061 58.4%
Erskine Bowles 9,669 40.1%
Tom Bailey 358 1.5%
Sampson
0%
Richard Burr 11,574 51.7%
Erskine Bowles 10,626 47.5%
Tom Bailey 169 0.8%
Scotland
0%
Erskine Bowles 6,282 58.5%
Richard Burr 4,336 40.4%
Tom Bailey 113 1.1%
Stanly
0%
Richard Burr 16,036 64.1%
Erskine Bowles 8,603 34.4%
Tom Bailey 376 1.5%
Stokes
0%
Richard Burr 13,456 67.8%
Erskine Bowles 6,138 30.9%
Tom Bailey 264 1.3%
Surry
0%
Richard Burr 16,740 65%
Erskine Bowles 8,735 33.9%
Tom Bailey 279 1.1%
Swain
0%
Erskine Bowles 2,587 51.6%
Richard Burr 2,344 46.8%
Tom Bailey 80 1.6%
Transylvania
0%
Richard Burr 8,586 56.2%
Erskine Bowles 6,421 42%
Tom Bailey 277 1.8%
Tyrrell
0%
Erskine Bowles 857 55.7%
Richard Burr 658 42.8%
Tom Bailey 24 1.6%
Union
0%
Richard Burr 39,383 66.1%
Erskine Bowles 19,451 32.7%
Tom Bailey 703 1.2%
Vance
0%
Erskine Bowles 9,633 60.6%
Richard Burr 6,137 38.6%
Tom Bailey 115 0.7%
Wake
0%
Erskine Bowles 177,324 51.4%
Richard Burr 163,069 47.3%
Tom Bailey 4,281 1.2%
Warren
0%
Erskine Bowles 5,424 67.6%
Richard Burr 2,510 31.3%
Tom Bailey 91 1.1%
Washington
0%
Erskine Bowles 3,285 60.1%
Richard Burr 2,126 38.9%
Tom Bailey 58 1.1%
Watauga
0%
Richard Burr 12,207 51.3%
Erskine Bowles 10,987 46.2%
Tom Bailey 580 2.4%
Wayne
0%
Richard Burr 23,026 56.9%
Erskine Bowles 17,116 42.3%
Tom Bailey 319 0.8%
Wilkes
0%
Richard Burr 18,173 65.9%
Erskine Bowles 8,967 32.5%
Tom Bailey 436 1.6%
Wilson
0%
Erskine Bowles 15,566 51.5%
Richard Burr 14,416 47.7%
Tom Bailey 223 0.7%
Yadkin
0%
Richard Burr 11,464 73.3%
Erskine Bowles 3,956 25.3%
Tom Bailey 215 1.4%
Yancey
0%
Erskine Bowles 4,718 49.9%
Richard Burr 4,594 48.6%
Tom Bailey 136 1.4%