William F. Buckley
There is a brand of turmoil out there that one can reasonably call "op-ed turmoil." By this is meant that the people who are upset are the critical class of Americans. This class has a lower threshold of pain than just plain Americans. If there is a civil rights whiff in the air, the leaves of civil rectitude will rustle.

There is reason to be grateful for the sensibilities of those who object to any government enlargement (except through higher taxes), but there comes a point when the non-clamorous public has to be given a voice, so to speak, by a public defender. A public defender is what President Bush et al. need right now in the matter of the national effort to heighten the national security, post-Sept. 11.

The general rule -- the paradigm -- says that all people are to be treated the same under the law, that all are to be informed of their (alleged) transgression, given habeas corpus and the right to counsel, to confront their accusers, to a speedy trial, and to exoneration unless unanimously found guilty.

The approach under the direction of President Bush does everything from sweeping away the protocols to holding some of them equivocally and putting some in abeyance. But an effort to judge reasonably what the administration is trying to do requires that we face the question before the people, which is, Have we sufficiently looked after internal security in an age of warfare the curtain-raiser of which was the events of Sept. 11? It pays to remind ourselves that it was only by chance heroism that Airliner No. 3 landed in one corner of the Pentagon, and Airliner No. 4 in Pennsylvania, the probable targets of both having been the White House and the Capitol.

President Nixon, we know, liked to write down on his yellow legal pad, sitting in his lonely office in the West Wing of the White House, the postulates of policy questions he faced and their deductions. Here is how he might have put it down:

(1) We don't know who they are.

(a) No, but they are probably Middle Eastern. And you can tell Middle Easterners when you look at them.

(2) They don't abide by rules. We abide by rules.

(a) The question is, What rules should we change?

(b) Some of the rules we change are, like, obvious. We don't want buggers coming into the country if we can find out they've had any connection with al-Qaida or other outfits doing terror or advocating it. So: more interrogation of people seeking visas from that part of the world.

William F. Buckley

William F. Buckley, Jr. is editor-at-large of National Review, the prolific author of Miles Gone By: A Literary Autobiography.

Be the first to read William Buckley's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.