The recent announcement by Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Arlen Specter that confirmation hearings on Judge Samuel Alito have been postponed until January was only the latest in a series of painful examples of what happens when Senate Republicans wimp out.
Senator Specter did not wimp out. The Senate Republican "leadership" wimped out when they made him chairman of the Judiciary Committee after he had fired a shot across the bow of his own President, right after the election, publicly warning President Bush not to nominate anyone to the Supreme Court who would stir up controversy in the Senate.
That was the time to replace Senator Specter with a chairman who would support, or at least not sabotage, the President's attempt to put the kind of people on the courts that he had pledged to appoint during the election campaign. Instead, the Senate "leadership" accepted Senator Specter's assurances that he would cooperate.
Well, now he is cooperating -- with the Democrats on his committee.
The delay in Judge Alito's confirmation hearings gives the Senate Democrats and all the liberal-left interest groups time to orchestrate a fear and smear campaign and raise the money to advertise those fears and smears, both directly and by organized protests that will get much free publicity in the liberal media.
There is another aspect to this. Liberal Senators have every incentive to drag out the confirmation process, regardless of how the final vote turns out, because the longer they stall the longer Sandra Day O'Connor remains on the Supreme Court. She is their kind of judge, one who makes policy instead of applying the law.
There was a time when the nomination of someone with Judge Alito's high qualifications to be on the Supreme Court would be confirmed by the Senate with little discussion and the confirmation reported with little comment in the media. But that was in earlier times, when common decency could be taken for granted.
Today, we can look for a Roman circus, complete with Christians being thrown to the lions. Worse yet, the idea will be reinforced that a judge's "views" on issues of the day are important and need to be questioned at interminable length.
Actually, the only view that really matters is a judge's view of the role of a judge. If a judge sees his role as applying laws passed by other people, then his own personal views on issues are irrelevant.
Demands for "more information" have also become part of this Roman circus, even when the Senators themselves know that the information they are asking for cannot be released.