It's been equal-opportunity week to attack Barack Obama because of his remarks that seemed to justify a U.S. invasion of Pakistan. Democrats and Republicans alike had a field day at the expense of the poor senator.
In the midst of all this, he addressed the annual meeting of the National Council of La Raza, and talked about realities at home. But those remarks, which I found at least as provocative and troubling, got little public attention.
NCLR is sort of the Hispanic NAACP.
Speaking before an audience of about 2,000, Obama, according to The Wall Street Journal, "compared last year's massive immigration rallies led by Hispanics to the civil-rights marches of African-Americans in the 1960s ..."
Regarding the population of illegals in our country today, Obama assured the crowd that "I will never walk away from the 12 million undocumented immigrants ..."
How odd for a candidate for the presidency of the United States to include looking out for the interests of illegals as a campaign promise.
He appears to have already deemed these folks immigrants. The first and central question, that they arrived and remain here illegally, seems of secondary concern to the Illinois senator, a Harvard-trained lawyer. They are just "undocumented immigrants." We just haven't had a chance to get the paperwork done.
Consider that when a newly elected president is sworn in, he (or she) swears to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." Yes, our Constitution, whose stated purpose is to "... provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity ..."
Obama is running as a new kind of politician. And it certainly is new for someone campaigning for our nation's highest office, aspiring to assume responsibilities to provide for our defense and to secure liberty for "ourselves," to see representation of the concerns of millions who are here illegally as part of those responsibilities.
Can it be that Obama thinks he is running for secretary-general of the United Nations and not president of the United States?
How about his equating immigration rallies to the civil-rights movement of the 1960s?
The analogy is, to say the least, bizarre. And it again gives a sense that the senator's left-wing vision of the world is far closer to his heart than to our own Constitution and how it relates to our citizens.
The injustices that blacks suffered had to do with lack of equal treatment and due process of law for our own citizens because of their race.