Salena Zito
Recommend this article

An Associated Press poll shows a majority of Republicans would not or could not say who they will vote for in the coming presidential election. Nearly one-quarter of those polled could not firmly back the current contenders, including prospective candidate Fred Thompson.

But is that their fault? Not entirely.

Much of that lack of enthusiasm can be traced to the summer of 2000 and Dick Cheney's vice-presidential search committee. Cheney was tapped by GOP nominee George Bush to find a suitable running mate, a person who could become Bush's and the party's heir apparent. Then-Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge and Oklahoma Gov. Frank Keating were among the top contenders. Keating made the final cut; the decider-in-chief chose Cheney.

How different would the country be had Keating not been discarded?

Markedly, Keating told me in a telephone interview last week.

Because the Bush administration picked a vice president who ended up having no presidential aspirations, we are left with decisions that have "taken (the) spirit out of the heart of the country; we do not have that feeling of being the 'shining city on the hill,'" Keating says.

Adding that there's more "growling" than "glowing" these days, Keating says "we have kicked the can down the road because there is no political investment in this administration in the next election and that is not the Republican way."

Had Keating been vice president, the GOP would not have had a vice president who has presided with the closed, deliberating style that Cheney has. And Bush would have looked toward 2008 as a legacy election, perhaps making decisions that were much more politically expedient, such as cutting loose an embattled attorney general. The administration would have focused on the traditional “third term” -- the one your sitting vice president holds on to for you.

Democrat strategist Steve McMahon, of McMahon Squire Lapp & Associates, is conditioned to expect a more efficient succession procedure from the GOP.

“Usually, the Republican nominating process is very orderly with an expected nominee, one that is generally nominated with very little acrimony and very little fanfare,” he said. “It is the way Republicans like to be.”

But he does not believe that is the reason malaise has beset the Republican base. “I think that what makes them enthusiastic is the same thing that makes Democrats enthusiastic, and that is raw, red meat.”

Issues like abortion, gay marriage, the Ten Commandments in every courthouse and border security -- the kind of stuff that Republicans like to sink their teeth into.

Recommend this article

Salena Zito

Salena Zito is a political analyst, reporter and columnist.