Big spending happens because lawmakers engineer a steady progression of things that “have to” pass. Klein cites raising the debt ceiling as an example. “Generally, this is a bipartisan vote, as the debt is a bipartisan creation. This year, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell reportedly told Majority Leader Harry Reid that if he wants an increase in the ceiling, he owns it and needs to find the votes for it,” Klein writes.
It’s a neat trick -- make conservatives responsible for spending they opposed. The country could also avoid raising the debt ceiling if lawmakers would slash spending. But that option never seems to come up in Congress.
This technique is baked in to health care policy. To make their numbers work, the Senate vowed to slash the amount Medicaid pays doctors by 20 percent. That’ll never happen, of course. Lawmakers will pass a “doc fix” bill separately, so they can claim the cost isn’t part of health reform. When that bill comes up, liberals will insist that conservatives join them in passing it, or accuse them of “obstructionism” and being in favor of cutting doctor pay.
Meanwhile, Klein raises a question that’s already been answered. “What happens when one of the two major parties does not see a political upside in solving problems and has the power to keep those problems from being solved?” Consider national security.
“President Bush’s War Has Cost Our Country Dearly,” was the title of an entry on the Democratic Caucus’s Senate Journal on Feb. 28, 2008. “This is George Bush’s war,” Sen. Harry Reid, then the Minority Leader, declared in June 2006. He was echoed by future Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. “This is George Bush’s war,” she announced in 2007.
We’ve seen the opposite dynamic in Congress under this president. When Barack Obama announced a surge of sorts to Afghanistan, his policy enjoyed more support on the right than on the left. Mature conservatives understand presidents don’t fight wars. Countries do. The U.S. can, must and will prevail in Iraq and Afghanistan -- and conservative support will be a big reason why.
As for spending, Klein concludes that “solving our fiscal problem is a mixture of easy arithmetic and hard choices, but until we solve our political problem, both are out of reach.” He should start by explaining where he’d begin cutting spending. That would be a prescription that would, deservedly, win conservative support.
###
Rich Tucker is senior writer at The Heritage Foundation, heritage.org.