"If all the votes are counted, Kerry will win." This is the sound bite du jour from Democrats. It is not just an expression of blustery partisan confidence. It is preparation for the political-legal conflagration that will ensue if President Bush scores a narrow election-night victory that Democrats think they can overturn.
The Democratic legal offensive has already been building in the states. As of the end of last week, there had been roughly 40 lawsuits filed, including the suits to keep Ralph Nader off the ballot. (In those Nader suits, by the way, Democratic lawyers have displayed a newfound appreciation for the niceties of election law -- they have worked, as they would put it in any other circumstance, to "disenfranchise" Nader petition-signers and would-be voters on mere technicalities.) All the suits have served to sow confusion and controversy over basic election procedures, which will come in handy if Democrats feel the need to urge the tossing aside of all reasonable election standards and safeguards in order to "count all the votes."
That phrase isn't quite what it seems. What Democrats have in mind in particular is so-called "provisional ballots." The 2002 Help America Vote Act says that any voter whose registration is uncertain, or who is unregistered, can still cast a provisional ballot. Then, after the election, the voter's name is checked against public records to ensure his eligibility and whether his vote should be counted.
In theory, it is a sensible idea, giving a voter who is the victim of some bureaucratic snafu the chance to vote. But the Democrats hope to turn the intention of the law on its head. Provisional ballots are presumed unlawful, unless demonstrated otherwise. They are votes that before HAVA would not have been legal. Many of them will deserve rejection on the merits, but Democrats will create pressure to count them all, no matter what -- "count all the votes."
Given the bogus registrations that have already been exposed by local news reports in places like Colorado, it is not hard to see the potential for fraud. If Democratic operatives have been keeping track of registrations, including bogus ones, it will be possible for them to try to "vote" those bad registrations on Nov. 2. And who can doubt that certain elements of the Democratic Party would feel morally justified in stealing this election as payback for Florida 2000?
Jon Stewart Attempts to "Slay" Food Stamp Fraud Allegations; Misses Real Point | Christine Rousselle
Rand Paul on NSA: “I Believe What You Do on Your Cell Phone is None of Their Damn Business” | Daniel Doherty