Media pundits can't understand why all the negative news coming out of Iraq doesn't produce poll results that show Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., defeating President George W. Bush. That's probably because Kerry's solution to the Iraq problem is to turn over its management to the United Nations.
The U.N. didn't have a lot of enthusiastic admirers before the Iraq war, and as news is sinking in about corruption on a scale never seen before, support for the U.N. is dropping to near zero.
Because of the hardships on Iraqi children from the sanctions imposed on Iraq after the first Persian Gulf War, beginning in 1996 Iraq was allowed to sell limited amounts of oil to finance the purchase of goods and medicines for humanitarian purposes. This oil-for-food program was supposed to be under tight U.N. supervision, but the U.N. was the fox guarding the henhouse.
The U.N. collected a 2.2 percent commission on every barrel of oil to pay for overseeing a flow of funds that totaled at least $67 billion, a task administered by 10 U.N. agencies employing a staff of 1,000. That was just the start of the giant oil-for-food rip-off.
The evidence is pouring in that more than $10 billion in bribes and kickbacks were siphoned off under the noses of the U.N. monitors. Oil-for-food was a giant scam that allowed Saddam Hussein to divert that incredible sum to finance his lavish lifestyle and to buy friends to keep himself in power.
The U.N. had no effective mechanisms for accounting or disclosure, and there never was any audit. Everything was secret: the price and quantity of the oil and of the goods for relief, the identities of the oil buyers, the quality of the food and medicines, the bank statements and all financial transactions.
U.S. Army Gen. Tommy Franks called the program "oil-for-palaces." Others called it UNScam. But Saddam's personal pocketing of an estimated $5 billion was only part of the racket; the rest of the illegal money financed a system of bribes to buy international support for his corrupt regime.
Now we know why the U.N., and especially France and Russia, opposed our goal of toppling Saddam. It wasn't because they are anti-American; it was because they were the chief beneficiaries of these secret deals with Saddam and they didn't want to turn off the money spigot.
From 1996-2002, oil-for-food was a cover that invited and sustained huge transfers of corruption-laden transactions between Iraq and major U.N. members, particularly Russia, France and China. Their profitable party would still be going on if the United States hadn't kicked Saddam out of power.
Here is how the scam worked:
Phyllis Schlafly is a national leader of the pro-family movement, a nationally syndicated columnist and author of Feminist Fantasies.
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Phyllis Schlafly‘s column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Rand Paul on NSA: “I Believe What You Do on Your Cell Phone is None of Their Damn Business” | Daniel Doherty