In the last two essays, I have argued that the next conservatism needs a
new conservative movement. In my more than forty years in Washington, I
have been involved in building more than one movement. There is a
political mechanics involved that works pretty much the same way for any
movement. Here, I want to share with you briefly how that mechanics of
movement-building works.
The first step is to identify a target list. Who do you want to reach?
For the most part, your target list will be people and organizations who
already share some of your views, and who are likely to be interested in
what your new movement wants to accomplish.
Next, you need to send out field teams to do audits. You want to audit
each potential ally or target group on its own ground. Your audit asks
questions such as:
What local organizations are effective?
What is their home ground??
Who do they reach??
How do they communicate??
Who are their most effective leaders??
The audit is your map; it tells you the lay of the land, so you know who
to talk to, who is real and who isn't.
Then you need to identify your own leader. It has to be someone other
people can look to as a leader, and it has to be someone who is willing
to take risks. You cannot build a new movement just by playing it safe
all the time. As Napoleon said, if you are going to make an omelet, you
have to break some eggs.
The next step is to get your leader together with the people and
organizations your audit has identified as potential allies. He needs to
have a written statement of your new movement's goals. For the most
part, anyone who will sign on to those goals can be part of your
movement. There will be cases, however, where your leader has to
recognize that some groups may be unacceptable to other groups your
movement needs more.
Then comes the single most important element. As your coalition of
interested groups and individuals grows, you must maintain constant
communication with them. They must always be receiving something new and
interesting from you, including not only information but also activities
in which they can join. Constant communication is the lifeblood of any
movement, and if it is not maintained, the movement will die.
Fortunately, thanks to the internet and other new technologies, it is
technically much easier and much less expensive to maintain constant
communication today than it was when I began in conservative politics in
the 1960s.