This may serve as a worthy blow against gun-grabbing hysteria. Instead of lashing out at the usual suspects (the infamous category of guns called assault weapons, despite the fact that these weapons account for a small and declining percentage of murders in this country), Newtowns move to put armed professionals in schools to protect children puts common sense back into our concerns for our children.
It is a major blow against the gun-free zones utopianism. Putting up a sign to say something is unlawful doesnt stop criminals. But it does put the kibosh on good guys with guns protecting folks (including children) against criminals. The gun-free zones notion is a mere pious hope, a wish, a dream. With a kick against the cause it allegedly supports.
Newtowns vote reverses that revered trend.
And its about time.
The vote also takes a metaphorical slap at all those who have made the NRA their whipping boy. It was the NRA, you will remember, that came out after the massacre and advised putting armed police protection in all schools, arguing that, The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. (I had made the somewhat less expensive suggestion that the gun-free zone idea be repudiated, and trained teachers and administrators be allowed to carry weapons to school.)
This Good Guys with Guns meme received a lot of ridicule.
Now, despite their loudly expressed loathing for the NRA, the advocates of further gun control legislation were quick to claim that they had no intention (or even the merest hankering!) to take away any guns now legally in the possession of law-abiding citizens. But the chief sponsor of the new federal legislation, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), has long been on record wanting to make Mr. and Mrs. America turn over their guns to the government.
Meanwhile, these same politicians, along with their adoring media lapdogs, began attacking the National Rifle Association as somehow the responsible party to the Newtown shooting and all other gun crimes (as if weapons defended by the Second Amendment and an organization supporting the Second Amendment were more to be feared than the trigger-pulling murderers).
Funny thing is, politicians are themselves guarded, daily (sometimes nightly and routinely), by women and men (presumably good men) with guns. And no one, I mean no one in politics, would consider disarming their own guardians. So gun control is very selective indeed.
The Newtown education board, by siding with the NRAs solution as the only near-term viable policy, does not address every issue regarding guns and control in America. But by repudiating the wishful thinking utopianism of Gun Free Zones and by emphasizing the addition of protection rather than the subtraction of the same, the Newtown vote hits a bulls eye. [further reading]