Section (a) of the bill requires ones new personal license plate to read, either PAID SIGNATURE GATHERER or VOLUNTEER SIGNATURE GATHERER. Though our nations High Court has ruled unanimously that citizens have a core right to hire people to circulate their petitions, legislators insolently hinder this right and belittle those exercising it.
Even though being a registered voter is not required of those who circulate petitions, SB-448s section (b) mandates that the chest-badge also contain either the California county in which one is registered to vote or display, NOT REGISTERED TO VOTE.
This proposed new law, no doubt deliberated over at length by these senators, would compel a husband or wife receiving a petition in the mail to fashion a badge and to wear it before engaging in any political conversation with one another. Or heaven forbid, talk to a parent. Or sibling. Or friend or neighbor or co-worker.
Citizens should not have to wear large badges on their chests when speaking to their neighbors or friends or relatives or, heck, even total strangers about politics. Or, for that matter, any subject two or more free people voluntarily choose to discuss.
Just to be clear the badge is to be nearly as large as a placard, Section (d) states, The print on the badge shall be no smaller than 30-point font.
I thought California Democrats were live and let live folks. Apparently that doesnt extend to petitioning ones government.
At least, not if the petition could have the impact of reforming government in ways our reviled politicians dont favor or to refer a law our rulers have passed to a vote of the people or to recall one of our exalted solons. While SB-448 harasses initiative petition circulators, none of the rules apply to the same petition circulator when working to gather signatures for Senator DeSaulnier or Hancock.
Oversight? Dont hold your breath waiting for a friendly amendment.
Government has no rightful power to force citizens to display signs on their chests saying what the government prescribes — no matter the message. This is even more clear regarding those engaged in petitioning their government, something the U.S. Supreme Court places at the zenith of the First Amendment.
The sponsors of this ludicrous legislation so despise the initiative process and bristle at the thought of the voters actually being their boss that they have lost their senses.
Is it any wonder why politicians arent better liked?
White House Squirms Over Hillary's Email Scandal, Forgets Embrace of Regular Law Breaking | Katie Pavlich
Clinton Used Server From Family Home For Personal Emails, Gave Her Additional Legal Protections | Matt Vespa