The state of the press

It wasn't just Mussolini's fascism that Oriana Fallaci detested but every other variety-national or racial, Italian or German, or, in her last years, Islamic. She tore into each as it appeared on history's chaotic stage - not only with her untamable words but her Florentine flair. Custom could not wither nor age stale the infinite variety of her invective. Or dim her glamor. All her life, she lured the powerful and celebrated like a Venus flytrap, and the aspiring Machiavellis of the world were her natural prey.

Signorina Fallaci saw through the practitioners of Realpolitik as if they were made of glass, brittle glass. After reading her, one could never again think of them in the same way. She had an unmatched talent for drawing attention to the specks of blood on their well-tailored cuffs, and the human groans behind their professorial talk about the balance of power and the correlation of forces. (Henry Kissinger said his interview with Fallaci "was the most disastrous conversation I ever had with a member of the press.")

There's nothing wrong with American journalism that couldn't be cured by a few more publishers who take their responsibility personally - the way William Allen White did - and a few more tough old broads who can not only write but think - a la Oriana Fallaci.

Or Florence King. Instead we get snappy neo-McCarthyites like Ann Coulter on one side and fashionables like Maureen Dowd on the other, for whom the adjective precious might have been invented. (You can take the girl out of the Upper East Side, but not the Upper East Side out of the girl.)

Oh, for another Oriana Fallaci, whose unflinching words survive her, and more publishers like the kind who brought her thoughts, and soaring spirit, to us.