Note: Co-authored by Rep. Tim Scott
 
America's laws have long recognized the need to protect workers from abuse. In 1935, Congress passed the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), which ensured that employees would have the right join a union ­ or to refrain from doing so -- free of harassment or intimidation.
 
In 1959, after a numerous hearings examining corruption within the labor movement, Congress passed the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA) in an effort to bolster self-governance, transparency, and democracy within unions.
 
But, since that time, progress for workers' rights has stalled.
 
As Big Labor and employers continue their ongoing power struggles, the rights of individual workers are far too often lost in the shuffle.  And, as we've seen under the Obama Administration, legal protections for workers who may oppose unionization can be easily swept aside by ideological bureaucrats.  
 
For these reasons, we've introduced the Employee Rights Act, a bicameral, pro-worker piece of legislation to bolster democracy in the workplace.
 
First, the Employee Rights Act will require a secret ballot vote in all union elections.  
 
According to the National Labor Relations Board, nearly 40 percent of all unions certified in 2009 did not have to go through an election. Presumably, most of these unions were certified through a combination of card checks and decisions by employers to accept the union without demanding a vote.  
 
Over the years, we've all heard the troubling accounts of unions obtaining signatures through deception and intimidation.  And, we've all heard about union organizing campaigns and boycotts that have all but forced employers to give up their right to demand a secret ballot vote.  Under the Employee Rights Act, that right will belong to the employees, and it will be guaranteed.  
 
While requiring these votes is important, it is only the first step in restoring democracy in America's workforce.  The vast majority of current union members ­ more than 90 percent according to some estimates ­ never had an opportunity to vote for their union, neither by card nor by ballot.  They simply accepted jobs at workplaces that were already unionized and, in many cases, they were forced to begin paying dues as a condition of employment.
 
The Employee Righ
1
Orrin Hatch

Orrin Hatch

Orrin Hatch is the United States Senator from Utah and serves on the Senate Committee on the Judiciary and the Senate Committee on Finance.

TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall columns and Townhall.com's daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Join the Debate
99 Comments So Far
« Previous12Next »
ksmith Wrote: Oct 22, 2011 2:53 PM
There was a day when unions served a valuable purpose improving working conditions for those in manufacturing jobs. Once conditions improved, however, the focus on pay and benefits seemed to re-focus union efforts and empower them toward goals that were deleterious to the companies upon which the workers depended for their jobs and those benefits. Power became the goal, and abuse of it the norm.
Fred1557 Wrote: Oct 22, 2011 2:19 AM
Unions and Union Representation is great if they use Democracy principles to decide on what is going on with them. Those using dictator principles are obviously not good.

Use of democratic principles in unions would protect the companies' workers and protect their jobs. This would make it better for the companies and the workers.

Obviously - no one wants their jobs or them destroyed by union dictatorship. This secret ballot idea would allow union members to get what is really needed in higher pay where companies can pay it without going broke.

I like unions and union bargaining, when the employees are not influenced by either the companies that might happen to be very big - or by the unions that might happen to be very big.
C.Wade Wrote: Oct 21, 2011 9:17 PM
No taxpayer at any level should be allowed to unionize because the unions have no productive purpose other than to cost employers money ,and in the public forum it is public money with no return on investment . As for other American unions , I will buy NO goods manufactured in America nor use any service in America that is of union origin until all union leaders make LESS than their average member .
WallyOzzy Wrote: Sep 14, 2011 2:49 AM
INDENTURED WORKER ! If there is anything this nation has suffored so greatly for, we can not escape the truths of it's evils, no matter in what form it is found. My grandfather (a ship's carpenter) fought Harry Bridges (verbally) on the waterfront of San Francisco because, as my people we have declared, ". . . it is not glory, it is not riches, neither is it honours, but it is liberty alone that we fight and contend for, which no honest man will lose but with his life.
Wallace
beowulfe2 Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 11:22 PM
Perhaps Graham's years of rebellion, drugs and women have clogged his brain. He obviously is not following his dad, who has garnered respect from around the world. This is what happens when you mix religion and politics, and those who do are living against the bible. To quote: Give to Caesar the things that are Ceasers. And unto God, the things that are Gods. I just hate it when these bible thumpers change or eliminate the bible to fit their needs. Praise the Lord, and pass the ammunition. They are at it again!!!
Fantasy Control Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 11:21 PM
In half of America, the word patriotism is considered a dirty word. This is the half of America supported by labor unions. in 2012, union workers need to take a hard look at people they are supporting, who, whether intentional or not, are helping to destroy everything that is good about America. It is not Republicans who are putting party above country, as evidenced by their vote for the Ryan plan, it is the Dems, who demogogued this attempt to right America's financial ship.

There are plenty of auto workers in the south who are more than happy to be part of a union free work force - no union dues. They work for companies who aren't going bankrupt.

Take a hard look Mr. Union Worker, then vote out all Democrats.
Big_D_ Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 8:46 PM
That would be nice, Orrin, but how about

National RIGHT TO WORK?

Oh, that's too conservative.
wessr Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 8:38 PM
The more things get out of hand the more conservatives using common sense makes its way. This Employee Rights Act is better late than never.
NeighborOfTheBeast Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 7:57 PM
Obama keeps saying that business and government need to be partners for the economy to improve. The only way for this economy to improve is for government to GET OUT OF THE WAY OF AMERICAN BUSINESS!!!
Ann272 Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 7:50 PM
and the continued attacks on former President George W. Bush date back to February, 2001, when he issued Executive Order 13201 directing that there would be an open shop for any companies doing business with the Federal Government, and that a sign would be posted showing in LARGE print that it was not necessary to belong to a union in order to work there.
NeighborOfTheBeast Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 7:44 PM
Unions have priced the American manufacturing industry out of business. What company wouldn't rather pay someone from Malaysia or Honduras $5/hr, which they could live on comfortably in their country and work their butts off for, than pay some whiner from Illinois or Michigan $40/hr (closer to $60-$75/hr after benefits and vacation pay) for the same job?
John Dallas Bowers Wrote: Sep 15, 2011 10:59 AM
My father had a woolen textile mill in Philadelphia that was forced to close its doors back in the early 1960s when its union workforce refused contract terms that would have made them competitive with nonunion mills in the South.

I remember his incredulity that his employees would rather lose their jobs than accept a modest adjustment in wages and benefits. You can read more about it here: http://johndallasbowers.com/mill.html
The Old Coach Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 7:43 PM
Unions today remind me of nothing so much as the feudal era when any group that could manage to assemble the power necessary simply raided the rest of society for booty, like pirates of the 17th and 18th centuries. Or the pirate gangs that rule Somalia and half of Mexico. Might makes right is their founding principle.

The only legitimate role of Government is to protect its' citizens from this kind of chaos.

Tribulation Force Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 7:38 PM
I saw some time ago that Government Motors is shedding some of its government equity in favor of private ownership.

Can't we all finally agree that George W. Bush socialized General Motors, and now that aformentioned company in the auto industry, is on the road to being DE-socialized under our foreign-born Islamic president?
Davole Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 8:10 PM
Tribulation Farce -

Your feeble, frantic, and obstinate spewing of off-topic gibberish to divert attention from Obama’s disastrous failures and discussion of this thread's actual topic is quite obvious!
Roy323 Wrote: Sep 14, 2011 5:15 PM
zappy--Ur flagged--as usual!!
NeighborOfTheBeast Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 7:28 PM
Boeing opening a huge new assembly line in South Carolina, a right to work state, and being sued by the NLRB on behalf of their union masters. Gibson guitars, who contributed to Republican candidates, being raided by the Fish and Wildlife SWAT team (who knew?) over imported pieces of wood that met the strict export rules of India, and told that they should move their company to India, taking 1,200 jobs out of the state of Tennessee. The recent fracas in Washington state over hiring the "wrong" union in the Port of Longview. Public union members in Wisconsin rioting over being asked to contribute a small portion of their own retirement and health care. What exactly are the modern unions doing to help the American worker?
Tribulation Force Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 7:25 PM
The Wall Street Journal for the weekend of January 15-16, 2011 has an article titled "The Great Auto Restructuring Shows Signs of Success."

I heard that General Motors will fail because it caters to the UAW. But, I must admit this article seemed to clear that mis-perception. Toward the bottom of the second column iT clearly says "GM's hourly labor costs now amount to just 6% of its revenue in North America. That's down from nearly 30% a few years ago..."

Hellooo....6% is just one-seventh of the money it receives in sales. Not a large component in the ole annual INCOME STATEMENT.

All conservatives could and should learn more about the GM restructuring! I will take that burden onto myself.
Davole Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 8:10 PM
Tribulation Farce -

Your feeble, frantic, and obstinate spewing of off-topic gibberish to divert attention from Obama’s disastrous failures and discussion of this thread's actual topic is quite obvious!
James296 Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 5:54 PM
Free of harassment or intimidation for refraining from joining a Union? Get real. In Chicago and New York those who refrained were taken out on a regular basis, and I don not mean to dinner and a movie.
Al1997 Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 5:31 PM
If we want to make sure the Union is really for the worker and not for the management of the Union. Then each state needs to have a 'Right to Work Law'. If the Union brings something to the table that makes sense to the worker, he will join. If not he will not join. It is economics, it is just that simple.
Nobody will pay dues to a corrupt organization unless he has a gun in his back.
beowulfe2 Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 5:24 PM
more from www.gop.gov/bill/112/1/hr1309

"Under both current law and this legislation, the NFIP may borrow an additional $3 billion from the Treasury."

"CBO also estimates that the changes made by H.R. 1309 would increase net income to the NFIP by $4.2 billion over the 2012-2021 period."

"H.R. 1309 would impose intergovernmental and private-sector MANDATES, as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA), on public and private mortgage lenders."

Why do I get the feeling that this Republican-controlled Congress will be adept at redistributing wealth from the bottom-up?

Why wasn't this program ABOLISHED?
westriversd Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 6:26 PM
What does that have to do with the subject of this article?
BrotherWinstonSmith Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 5:10 PM
Excuse me if I completely ignore the dishonest ramblings of YET ANOTHER leftist republican. THANKS to fake-conservative, fake-tea Palin for supporting Hatch a few weeks ago. Hopefully she only invited people to investigate Hatch's record.

Orrin hatch:
TARP
Stimulus
Amnesty
Medicare Part D
SCHIP
Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Bailout
No Child Left Behind
PATRIOT Act
Reginald10 Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 4:46 PM
I grew up near a coal mining area; we had their TV stations and newspapers. When the United Mine Workers went on strike, their actions toward the mines and particularly non-union mines and miners were nothing short of terrorism. Google Jock Yablonski, who was murdered along with his wife and daughter, in a UMW dispute. By the way, Obama's good buddy Trumpka of the AFL/CIO is an alumnus of the UMW.
Alan from NJ Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 4:15 PM
Cannot believe we are dealing with this in America.
Who do the elected officials work for ?
Those that will take Democracy down by voting perks for themselves, like all the Ancient Greek Democracies (that crashed), or those that realize this is a Democratic Republic? The average citizen does not seem to know any History.
Not allowing people to work, as non-union members, is an abridgement of their pursuit of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Note that the Democratic voters are moving to States where unions are weak. More jobs, there. No curiosity as to why?

Ken6226 Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 3:28 PM
Unions have become little more than protection rackets.
PaddyL Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 4:39 PM
Actually some of them appear to be in training for Obama's Brown shirts. They will take to the streets if necessary to advance their leader's political agenda.
John21 Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 2:39 PM
Scabs, the lowest of the low. Just about every poster here would be a scab if a union would let them in. Someone who would stab their brother in the back and take away all the priviliges they fought so hard to gain.
Ray31 Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 3:27 PM
Unions, namely the Teamsters Union, have cost me my job three times in my career. I worked for several trucking companies in IT. The unions are unbending even when faced with balance sheets that indicated the companies were broke. In one instance the union continued to strike after bankruptcy was filed. The union leaders claimed there were two sets of books. The Teamsters used intimidation and thuggary. The rank and file actually thought they worked for the union, not the trucking company.
Ray31 Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 3:28 PM
Continued - the union had a "suits on the dock" unwritten policy that when managers came on the dock, they tried to see how close they could run to them with the forklifts, just missing the manager's foot in most cases. They were constantly looking for a reason to "file a Grievance". One person filed on me for pulling a new report I had generated. She said I was taking work away from her. Never mind that it was a test report they she could not yet have access to. Unions broke the trucking industry. I was there to witness it first hand.
Ray31 Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 3:33 PM
I witnessed a terminal manager's tires being slashed inside the fence at a secure terminal location by the very union employees who reported to him. The Terminal Manager was afraid for his life and had to carry a pistol. These union thugs think nothing of sabotaging equipment and freight.
Ken6226 Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 3:27 PM
I've read all three of your posts, and you are making NO sense.
westriversd Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 6:29 PM
Sorry I flagged you, thought you were replying to Ray.
NeighborOfTheBeast Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 6:51 PM
Unions did great things for the American worker in the early 20th century. Their efforts gave us the 40-hr workweek, weekends, paid vacations, minimum wage and countless safety regulations. They did so through violence, thuggery, destruction of private property, murder, fear and intimidation.

Since then, the working man's world has changed through automation and globalization. The unions have not changed. Look at what happened in the town of Longview, WA recently. When the local Port Authority hired an equipment operators union to run the cranes in the new grain depot, the teamsters, who felt that those jobs were theirs, assaulted and took hostage six rent-a-cops, destroyed the new equipment, sabotaged the rail cars and dumped the grain.
NeighborOfTheBeast Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 6:54 PM
These union thugs went crazy and did all this, not because the Port Authority didn't use union labor, but because they hired the "wrong" union!
jimmylynn Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 10:07 PM
No John....the lowest of the low would force people to join a union they did not want to belong to....just to get work.....then take money from them and use it to support political causes that they would never support. That's all unions are John.....a bunch of corrupt hoodlums. The only scabs I know of are the ones you would have while you were healing if you wanted to try and force something on me.
jimmylynn Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 10:08 PM
Unions haven't fought hard to gain anything John. They have fought hard to steal stuff.
John21 Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 2:34 PM
troubling accounts of unions obtaining signatures through deception and intimidation? have not heard as much of this as we hear certain companies(ie. walmart) firing people and shutting down stores if their employees want a fair shake.
employee rights act= no rights at all, just another union busting scheme.
Ray31 Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 3:47 PM
who do you think should decide to shut down a store or not? The govt, the union? The business decides for whatever reason it has. Business are not social clubs set up to support people in the manner to which they have become accustomed. They are set up solely to make a profit, not for the union to make a profit. Here's a suggestion - Ask your employees to form their own union (Corp) and open their own stores. Lets see how long they last.
westriversd Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 6:32 PM
Dear John, name the Walmart stores that have been shut-down? I have lived in many cities and have not seen a closure. Sure have seen a lot of new ones, like the one being built nearly in my back yard.
John1921 Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 1:37 PM
Hatch must be defeated in the next election. What a pathetic buffoon. The role of labor unions is not, and never has been, in doubt. A labor union is a conspiracy to commit extortion. It is an inherently criminal organization. Period. At Common Law, they were always considered illegal, as conspiracies, with strikes simply crimes. The essence of Progressivism was always to legalize the illegal and to allow the prohibited, everywhere. All wrong.
Trent10 Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 4:28 PM
Um, John---what do you think Hatch is talking about? This act would be an extremely powerful force to geld the unions and destroy much of their nefarious power. I agree with you about the unions--this proposed legislation should be good news to you.
westriversd Wrote: Sep 13, 2011 6:33 PM
So, which side are you on, union or right to work?
« Previous12Next »