Never.  The Democrats were showing a crass level of complete disrespect for the Constitution of the United States and for years of Senate tradition.  We shouldn't be surprised, though.  When it comes to reacquiring their Senate power, it is clear that neither the Constitution nor the successful conclusion to our war against terrorism and the restructuring of Iraq can be allowed to stand in the way.

As it turns out, the Constitution gives the president a bit of an out when the Senate is acting up like this.  Move on to Clause 3.  The president can make recess appointments.  This Bush did with two judicial nominees that the Democrats had filibustered, Pryor and Pickering.  You must know that this didn't sit too well with Daschle and Company.  How dare the President of the United States use a constitutional procedure to prevent them from blocking a confirmation vote?  Their response?  They proceeded to bring virtually all presidential nominations, even the ones they liked, to a complete standstill.

Let's review here.  I?m not trying to waste space, but there may be Democrats reading this column.  In government schools, we must be careful not to leave them behind when we get into even the most moderately complicated situations.   We will call this "back up and repeat essential points" as the  "No Liberal Left Behind? style of writing.

A.  The Democrats modify the Constitution by requiring a super-majority vote for the confirmation of certain judicial nominees.

B.  The president responds by using the perfect constitutionally legitimate exercise of making a recess appointment.

C.  The Democrats, outraged at the president's legal use of his Constitutional authority, bring nearly all Senate business to a halt in retaliation.

D.  The president promises to stop any further recess appointments during this term if the Senators will only do the job they were elected to do.

This is leadership?  When George W. Bush was sworn in he swore an oath to ?preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.?  Just how are you preserving, protecting and defending the Constitution when you promise to stop using a constitutionally legitimate procedure to prevent political opponents from defying the Constitution.. and for this we get a quick confirmation of about 27 judicial nominees whom the Democrats didn?t object to in the first place?  Wow!  What a deal!

Senate Democrats must be getting a real chuckle out of this in their private gatherings.  Time after time they have rolled George Bush.  Protectionist trade rules for the steel industry, obscene spending increases for hopeless government schools, even the left?s current political showpiece of the 9/11 Commission hearings.