Mona Charen

 Instant election analysis is like instant breakfast -- frothy and lacking in substance. Remember the angry white males of 1994? They never existed, but became, through constant repetition, the "lesson" of the 1994 race. Remember the soccer moms and the "year of the woman"? Most of these categories were meaningless.
This time, the talking heads are rushing to interpret the 2004 election as the year of the values voter. A little skepticism is in order. Twenty-two percent of the electorate identified "moral values" as the "most important issue" shaping his or her vote. No other single issue garnered an equal or higher percentage. But that hardly yields the interpretation that values were the most important election issue.

 The economy/jobs were cited by 20 percent of voters, 80 percent of whom voted for Kerry. Concern about terrorism also played a large role, with 19 percent saying it was the most important issue. Eighty-six percent of those voters chose Bush. And the war in Iraq motivated another 15 percent of voters, 73 percent of whom chose Kerry. Other issues like education, taxes and health care were cited by fewer than 10 percent each.

 If we add together those who voted on terrorism and the war in Iraq, we see 34 percent of voters choosing foreign policy as the most important issue -- though these voters did not opt for the same candidate.

 Even if we assume that the exit polls were completely accurate -- and in light of the Election Day fiasco when leaks indicated that Kerry had won handily, there is strong reason to doubt this -- the numbers do not add up to a moral values election.

 I'd love to see the American people say with one voice that they are disgusted with the trash-mouth Hollywood types, the porn industry that invades our computers and our cable channels, the unethical businessmen, the foul reality shows, the abortion mills, kids killing kids over sneakers, the drugs, the child abuse, the shock jocks ... well, I have only 750 words so I'll stop there.

 The point is: We've got a long way to go before that day dawns. Frankly, even on beloved Fox News Channel -- the greatest thing to happen to the American media since the birth of Bill Buckley -- we must endure ads for Cialis and Viagra. I must dive for the remote so that my 8- and 11-year-olds (for whom Brit Hume is a rock star) do not hear the voice-over saying, "Ask your partner what she had in mind." Notice that they never say "wife" or "husband." And then, "For erections lasting longer than 4 hours, contact your doctor." No kidding. But do my kids have to hear this?

Mona Charen

Mona Charen is a syndicated columnist, political analyst and author of Do-Gooders: How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help .
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Mona Charen's column. Sign up today and receive daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
©Creators Syndicate