Those who advocate the murder of innocent children trapped inside the womb are simply among our most cowardly citizens. Among that minority, none is more cowardly than radio talk show host Neal Boortz. He serves as an advocate for the “choice” to dismember those who cannot defend themselves. He also attacks the defenders of life and refuses them the opportunity to call into his show or debate in a format where he does not control the exchange of ideas. His assertion that he “does not discuss abortion” is simply false. He brings it up all the time – to the point of obsession. But Boortz does not debate abortion because he is not a true libertarian. Boortz is a social liberal. And there’s a big difference as the follow exchange will aptly demonstrate:
Neal: I have been informed of a recent series of statements about me (in conjunction with the issue of abortion) on your radio show. I don't mind them at all. I fully support your rights per the First Amendment. But, in light of those remarks, I believe it is fair for me to renew my challenge to debate you on the issue of abortion. If you would like me to stop asking you to debate then you may simply drop the issue. However, if you continue to raise the issue on air, I will periodically reach out to you with a respectful offer to debate.
Please consider this to be a formal and respectful request to reconsider debating me on the issue of abortion. You have stated repeatedly that you think liberal talk radio cannot work because liberal talk show hosts would be forced to defend their ideas when people call in to the show. Now, you have assumed a liberal stance on abortion. The question is: Could you survive a debate on the merits of the issue?
Within ten minutes of sending this message my phone rang. Neal was responding to the challenge on air while tucked away safely in his recording studio. The effort to get Neal to respond directly continued:
Hi Neal: Just a few minutes after I sent my request to you I received a phone call indicating that you had responded on air. The listener indicated that you said you would let me on the air if you did not have to "clean up the yak afterwards." Just as a matter of clarification, I am challenging you to an extended debate, rather than a brief exchange on your program. I hope this will help you respond to me directly, rather than on air. My cell phone number is 910.xxx.xxxx if you would like to discuss. I am eager to go head to head with you in a live in-person debate.
Losing Jobs Over Ex-Im’s Expiration? Don’t Believe ItLosing Jobs Over Ex-Im’s Expiration? Don’t Believe It | Ed Feulner