Hate Mail 2008

Mike Adams

4/21/2008 12:00:09 AM - Mike Adams

Dr. Adams:

It’s been a long time since you ran a column featuring your favorite hate mails. Why don’t you do so? Are you not getting enough? How about this: You’re an idiot, Dr. Adams … and a pansy!

David

Dear David:

All right, David, I get your point. I’ll run some in my next column.

Mike Adams

Dr. Adams,

I have read a lot of things that have made me angry but none so much as your column “one giant leap for person-kind.” Ho [sic] dare you ridicule feminists when I just graduated from college and make 30% less just because I am a woman?

Rebecca

Hi Rebecca. First of all, the research does not say that you make 30% less because you are a woman. Your figures are wrong. Furthermore, the discrepancies in male/female salaries are a function of years in the workforce. If a woman chooses to have children (and stay home) that is her choice. It is not patriarchal oppression. These variables are omitted in studies conducted at major American gyneversities [sic?] in order to keep you angry about oppression that is not actually happening. You should not be angry about something that is not happening to you. You should be angry because, although you got a college degree, you did not get a decent education. But that’s no reason to call me a “ho.”

Mike Adams

From: csm@cox.net
To: adams_mike@hotmail.com
Subject: embarrassing
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:20:58 -0700

Dear Mr. Adams,

Just finished listening to an interview with you on Thom Hartmann’s excellent web site. You help me understand why our college graduates fare so poorly in worldwide comparisons of academic excellence. Please revisit you [you] attempt at “schooling” Thom regarding your wacky assertions of no discrimination against women in the workforce. You assert equal opportunity but something funny like “no guaranteed outcomes.” Where in the world did you dream that one up and then try to back it up with saying that women after having children are behind men in pay? That logic doesn’t stand on any merit – check with a logician. Nor does it stand statistically.

Good grief man, I feel for your young impressionable students who mistakenly look up to you. Shameful, but representative of the dominant culture in this country responsible for bring the world to the brink of destruction. How you ever got your advanced degree is a perfect example of why the world is so messed up, run by mediocre, unsophisticated, juvenile, unintelligent men.

Did I mention that your ego was overstated and that you were absolutely no match for Thom who is one of the most eloquent and educated minds in America?

You didn’t even know it but you embarrassed yourself and your cOnSeVaTiVe “bowel” MoVeMeNt….. Although that’s par for the course.

Not surprising then that your book is a JOKE, too, just like you.

Warm regards, but I find you absolutely disgusting,

Chuck

Chuck, the misunderstanding seems to flow from your lack of familiarity with the term "statistical" control. Would you consider enrolling in a freshman statistics course at a local junior college? Assuming you pass - and you seem brilliant, really - we could resume this conversation after you have begun to grasp the central issue. And, of course, I will place the burden of proving gender discrimination on you.

Good luck, Chuck.

Mike S. Adams

What an ass!

Nora

Thanks, Nora. I’m sure you have a nice ass, too.

Mike S. Adams

From: david.appell@gmail.com on behalf of David Appell
Sent: Sun 1/13/2008
2:15 PM
Subject: Halperin

Noticed that you gave David Halperin's email address in your 1/9 Townhall.com article, but didn't even give your own. Classy.

David

It's right below the title.

Mike Adams

Well, a (purported) link to it is. Nicely hidden away from spammers. A courtesy you didn't extend to Halperin.

Like I said, classy.

Why was it journalistically necessary to include his email address, anyway?

David

I david.appell@gmail.com promise david.appell@gmail.com I david.appell@gmail.com will david.appell@gmail.com never david.appell@gmail.com do david.appell@gmail.com it david.appell@gmail.com again david.appell@gmail.com David david.appell@gmail.com. Sorry david.appell@gmail.com if david.appell@gmail.com I david.appell@gmail.com offended david.appell@gmail.com you david.appell@gmail.com.

Mike Adams

Why don’t you answer my emails? Is it just me or do you ignore everyone?

Ted

It’s just you.

Mike Adams

I’ll bet you can’t look me in the eye and explain why Jesus would want you to own so many guns. The reason is you’re a hypocrite.

Guy

You’re right to bet I can’t look you in the eye and explain why Jesus would want me to own so many guns. The reason is you’re on the internet. You know, as opposed to standing in front of me.

Thanks for your insights and Happy New Year!

Mike Adams

You criticize the Vagina Monologues in every other column. Have you ever seen the Vagina Monologues?

Rebecca

This morning, I was jogging near Wrightsville Beach. I saw a pile of dog manure in the path in front of me. I suppose I could have picked up the dog manure, smelled it, and even taken a bite out of it to determine with certainty that it was, in fact, dog manure. But, instead, I just went around it. I really don’t need to immerse myself in crap to know that it is crap any more than I need to go to a brothel to determine that fellowship with whores is not something to be desired. This is not to say that every feminist who performs in the Vagina Monologues is a whore.

I hope this helps.

Mike Adams

You really don’t know what you are talking about when you criticize ebonics. Why can’t you just shut your mouth?

Anonymous

What kind of drugs are you on?

Mike S. Adams

Dude, you cannot even speak English. You just ended a sentence with a preoposition [sic].

Anonymous

Is this better: What kind of drugs are you on, Jackass?

Mike S. Adams

Why can you not understand that a rape victim muct [sic] be allowed to abort the baby if she becomes pregnant? We were invaded on 911. We rataliated [sic]and killed many icconcent [sic] children. Why are you suddenly concerned with the killing of this child of a rapist. [sic] Is not the rapist a foreign invader?

Anonymous

Dear Anonymous:

There is a fundamental difference between the accidental an intentional killing of children. I do not know why you are confused. As Justice Holmes once said: "Even a dog knows the difference between being tripped over and being kicked." Think about it for awhile. If you cannot understand your logical error, I think you muct [sic] be less intelligent than a dog.

Mike S. Adams

From: obancameron@gmail.com yo, wtf do you have a gun in your hand for? it's in the pic on your fromt [sic] page. I was surfing the web and found your site, having no idea what it's about I would love to know why fire arms are on your front page.

oban cameron

Dear Oban:

I have a firearm on my home page for essentially the same reason a dog licks his genitals: Because he can and he enjoys it.

Like the dog, it is best to leave me alone to enjoy doing what I enjoy doing. I hope you understand. Your opinion means a lot to me.

Mike S. Adams

From: Nottelling@uncw.edu

You call yourself a Christian? Jesus Christ would never push people’s buttons the way you do.

Anonymous

Dear Anonymous:

You are right. Jesus never would have pushed people’s buttons. Had he pushed people’s buttons, they might have crucified him.

Mike S. Adams