Trent Lott, the Republican Party's eternal Maalox moment, has
given the Beltway's liberal pontiffs on race exactly what they crave: a big,
fat excuse to extract legislative payoffs to ease their collective "pain."
On Wednesday, the Senate Republican leader went on Fox News and
CNN promising more race-conscious government remedies to make amends for his
tacit endorsement of segregation. In interviews with Sean Hannity and Larry
King, Lott cravenly pledged support for "community renewal" (more minority
set-asides); said he would "put more money into education so no child is
left behind" (more federal spending for failed urban programs); and boasted
of his "African-American interns" and appointments (more racial
preferences).
My fellow conservatives, if you weren't already convinced that
the Mississippi senator was a gutless, ineffective, self-preservationist sap
before his remarks at Strom Thurmond's 100th birthday party last week, this
pandering to the race Mafiosi in the aftermath of his comments seals the
deal.
Democrats are circling the wagons. Senator Joe Lieberman of
Connecticut demanded that Lott "speak from his moral center" (this presumes
he has one) and that he "make clear his commitment to racial equality." How
does Lieberman think Lott should do this? Oh, no, not by calling for an end
to government racial preferences (as Lieberman once did before he was
re-educated) or by meeting with the true moral heirs of the civil rights
movement -- leaders like conservative Ward Connerly who could teach Lott a
lesson or two about principled support for race neutrality and how best to
achieve it.
Lieberman wants Lott to meet "with the members of the
Congressional Black Caucus (to) show that he understands the hurt his
comments have caused." Yes, by meeting with the racial demagogues of the
Black Caucus, Lott can show his clarion commitment to racial equality.
And how will the "hurt" be repaired? Rep. Bennie Thompson,
D-Miss., already has his wish list in order. According to the Biloxi Sun
Herald, Thompson thinks Lott can "make up for his statement" by "pushing for
a minimum wage increase, expanded affordable housing and a prescription drug
benefit." Cha-cha-ching.
Both liberals and conservatives who are lambasting the vacant
Lott as an unrepentant bigot give him too much credit, methinks. The former
college cheerleader did at Thurmond's birthday party what he has done all of
his life: He mouthed the words he thought his audience at the moment wanted
to hear. Lott never actively donned a white sheet, like his Senate colleague
and ex-Klansman Robert Byrd, D-West Va. Instead, Lott is, and always has
been, on the sidelines of America's race debate.
When James Meredith weathered violent riots in his brave quest
to integrate the University of Mississippi in the fall of 1962, Lott was
neither standing next to him nor standing with the segregationist mob. The
Ole Miss alum was holed up inside his frat house, preserving his and his
brothers' political viability.
There is only one cause, one animating spirit that Trent Lott is
committed to: not the South, not the segregationist past, but himself and
his future in high office. And now, to save his hide, Lott will shake his
pompoms and turn somersaults to please whomever (Rep. Maxine Waters,
D-Calif., the Rev. Al Sharpton) can help him stay in power.
One of the supreme ironies in all this mess is that the White
House and GOP leadership are entirely comfortable with the kind of
contemptible race-conscious payoffs Lott is poised to make on behalf of the
Republican Party. As governor of Texas, George W. Bush signed laws
supporting minority contracting set-asides; directing electric utilities to
develop diversity and set-aside plans; and creating race-targeted
scholarship programs.
Bush also enthusiastically campaigned for a baseball stadium tax
hike on the grounds that "a vote for the tax would be a vote for contracts
for African American businesses," and to the horror of equal-opportunity
conservatives, he ordered his Justice Department to support racially
discriminatory federal contracting set-asides last year before the Supreme
Court.
So while the headless chicken brigade here in Washington screams
about Lott "tearing the country apart" with his idiotic words, the New
Segregationist policies supported by both the party of Sharpton and the
party of Bush continue unabated. It's racial logrolling as usual.