Dr. Patrick Chavis is dead. Will the liberal politicians and
gullible media who made him a poster boy for government-imposed affirmative
action shed a single tear, or will they continue to ignore what a shameful
tragedy his life became?
According to a Los Angeles County Sheriff's detective I spoke
with last week, Chavis was murdered on the night of July 23 in Hawthorne, an
economically depressed neighborhood on the southern edge of Los Angeles.
Three unknown assailants shot him during an alleged robbery at a Foster's
Freeze. They remain on the loose. The news has yet to be reported anywhere
else, but sources told me it was the buzz of the Los Angeles medical
community last week.
Seven years ago, Chavis became the toast of the media elite and
the racial preference crowd when he was profiled lavishly by New York Times
magazine writer Nicholas Lemann. Chavis, who made the cover of the magazine,
was a black physician admitted to the University of California-Davis medical
school under a special racial-preference quota. In 1978, the U.S. Supreme
Court later struck down the program after a landmark challenge by white
applicant Allan Bakke. Lemann contrasted what he considered Bakke's
unremarkable career following the lawsuit with Chavis' noble and booming
ob-gyn practice in the ghetto of Compton.
Three months later, Jane Fonda's ex-husband, left-wing
California politico Tom Hayden, heaped praise on Chavis in defense of
affirmative action. "Bakke's scores were higher," Hayden wrote in an article
for The Nation, "but who made the most of his medical school education? From
whom did California taxpayers benefit more?" Sen. Ted Kennedy picked up the
banner a year later, calling Chavis "a perfect example" of the need for
lowering admissions standards in the name of racial diversity. The doctor,
Kennedy crowed, was "making a difference in the lives of scores of poor
What The New York Times never got around to reporting, as Boston
Globe columnist Jeff Jacoby first noted and journalist William McGowan later
chronicled in his award-winning book "Coloring the News," is that the
"difference" Chavis made in the lives of several young black women involved
gruesome pain -- and death -- as a result of botched "body sculpting"
operations at his clinic.
An administrative law judge found Chavis guilty of gross
negligence and incompetence in the treatment of three patients. Yolanda
Mukhalian lost 70 percent of her blood after Chavis hid her in his home for
40 hours following a bungled liposuction; she miraculously survived. The
other survivor, Valerie Lawrence, also experienced severe bleeding following
the surgery; after Lawrence's sister took her to a hospital emergency room,
Chavis barged in and discharged his suffering patient -- still hooked up to
her IV and catheter -- and also stashed her in his home.
Tammaria Cotton bled to death and suffered full cardiac arrest
after Chavis performed fly-by-night liposuction on her and then disappeared.
In 1997, the Medical Board of California suspended Chavis'
license, warning of his "inability to perform some of the most basic duties
required of a physician." In a statement filed by a psychiatrist, the state
demonstrated Chavis' "poor impulse control and insensitivity to patients'
pain." A tape recording of "horrific screaming" by patients in Chavis'
office revealed the doctor responding callously: "Don't talk to the doctor
while he is working" and "Liar, liar, pants on fire."
If Allan Bakke, the white doctor, had engaged in such
disgraceful behavior and met such an ignominious end, you can bet the Left
would never let us forget it.
But Ted Kennedy and Tom Hayden, who spoke so voluminously about
the poor black patients who supposedly benefited from medical affirmative
action, had nothing to say about the poor black women who were brutally
victimized by the incompetent Chavis. As for The New York Times, Bill
McGowan wrote: They "ran nothing to amend their false portrait of an
affirmative action hero, or question the legitimacy of the race-conscious
social policy that had made him a doctor. A riveting, nationally newsworthy
story central to the country's discussion of racial preferences somehow
ended up completely falling through the cracks."
Will the Times editors bother to run an obituary about their
fallen affirmative action hero? Will Ted Kennedy send his condolences?
Don't hold your breath.