If Columbia University's President Considers This a Form of Protesting, The Terror Camp...
Former Rolling Stone Editor's Biting Attack on the NYT's 'Adults' Piece About Speaker...
The Left Gets Its Own Charlottesville
Pro-Hamas Activists March on NYPD HQ After Police Dismantled NYU's Pro-Hamas Camp
A Girl Went to Wendy's and Ended Up With Permanent Brain Damage
Democrats Are Going to Get Someone Killed and They’re Perfectly Fine With It
Postcards From the Edge of Cannibalism
Why Small Businesses Hate Bidenomics
The Empire Begins to Strike Back
The Empires Begin to Strike Back
With Cigarette Sales Declining, More Evidence Supports the Role of Flavored Vapes in...
To Defend Free Speech, the Senate Should Reject the TikTok Ban
Congress Should Not Pass DJI Drone Ban Legislation
Republican Jewish Coalition Endorses Bob Good's Primary Opponent Due to Vote Against Aid...
Here's What Kathy Hochul, Chuck Schumer Are Saying About Columbia University's Pro-Hamas P...
OPINION

Independent Voters Giving up on Obama ... Thank You, Mr. President

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

They were the cornerstone of his 2008 election, independent voters who wanted "change" they could believe in. But of independent voters, according to a new ABC News/Washington Post poll, only 38 percent have a favorable view of President Obama's economic plans. A strong majority of 54 percent disapproves of Obama's handling of the economy.

Advertisement

This is interesting in light of an email I received from a highly successful former officer in a well known publicly held company that was sold several years ago. He is a friend and a great guy ... with a lot of money, who explained, from a previous column I had written, that I was a better political pundit than economist. He proceeded to quote all of the statistics that showed that businesses (large businesses, of course) were having their best year in ages -- everything was fantastic.

And I have no doubt that to be the case ... but not for the "private sector" or the "average American" nor just about anyone in the day-to-day working world. It's time to make clear that there is a huge difference between a family or individual making $250,000, but likely paying for a mortgage, university tuition, health insurance and increased deductibles, huge taxes on a residence, federal taxes, in many cases state taxes, plus local sales and local option sales taxes, and a guy who pockets millions of dollars and sees the world through special and fortunate rose-colored glasses.

The bottom line is that we, the real Americans who try to create a job or two, are suffering and are about ready to give up. Perhaps that's why the average Joe doesn't give a hoot about the quarterly profit of the largest of businesses.

Advertisement

Just consider the following. This allegedly rich family or person earning $250,000 a year likely has a small business that he or she owns, or works for a company whose salary allows the individual to give, on many cases, half of that income up before a dime goes to anything but government-related entities. To Barack Obama, that is a person who needs to give his or her "fair share."

But that individual feels more like he or she is on the ledge, stressed out, scrambling for business or income, a target. This person is no Warren Buffet ... this is a wannabe Jimmy Buffet who wants to escape with a shirt, some shorts, and something sunny and something positive to look forward to -- but can't. Thank you, Mr. President.

Here is why the so-called the "private sector" is not doing so well. For the average "private-sector souls," the cost of health insurance is up, or their company is offering a program with a vastly higher deductible. Their pharmaceutical costs are through the roof, and if they are seniors, they can't find a family physician who will take Medicare because of planned reimbursement reductions. All of this is allegedly "defensive medicine" to brace for "Obamacare." Thank you, Mr. President.

Advertisement

For the average "private-sector souls," their house has lost value, they are fighting to keep up with their mortgage, and the "big bank" that loaned them the money to buy it won't work with them at all to lessen the pain. Those banks are now so regulated by Dodd-Frank that even if they wanted to, they would only lend money to those who don't need it. Thank You, Mr. President

The president's answer to our economic woes is to "tax the wealthiest Americans" as soon as possible and increase the tax on "capital gains" for the same "rich folk." That's great. So the small-business owner who employs three or four people and pays his or her corporate taxes basically on an individual basis has to consider letting another employee go in January of 2013 in order to make ends meet. And the average person with shares in the stock market figures it will be time to sell before those 2013 capital gains tax increases go into effect -- likely causing a down market. Thank you, Mr. President.

Here's my take on Barack Obama. I really do believe, unlike many who pontificate, that Obama is a good man with a fine family. It's just a simple matter of a president who never worked in the private sector, only knew government and social activism as an answer to any problem, and a guy who quickly -- through books and the magic of the modern presidency -- will never know the economic and personal hardship of running a small business, thinking he understands the private sector.

Advertisement

The public is catching on to this, and they are ready to say, "Thank you, Mr. President" -- as they usher out the door of the White House in 2013.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos