An InsiderAdvantage/Majority Opinion survey of 1044 registered voters nationwide shows public opinion evenly split over the opinion provided by General David Petraeus in his report this week to Congress on our progress in Iraq. That's the good news for President Bush, given the many reports and commentaries that suggest the general had a sketchy case.
Now the bad news for Bush and proponents of a 30,000-troop reduction by next summer: By a 58 percent to 34 percent margin, Americans say the reduction is not enough. A majority wants more troops than that home by then.
Here's the key: By a 43 percent to 36 percent margin, poll respondents said they'd be less likely to vote for the Republican nominee for president if a substantial number of troops "have not been withdrawn from Iraq by Election Day." (The other 21 percent were undecided.)
The plot gets even thicker when the poll is broken down by party affiliation. Nearly 20 percent of those identifying themselves as Republicans said they'd be less likely to vote for their own party's nominee if big troop reductions don't happen.
Among those who consider themselves independent voters -- the ones who put recent Republican presidential candidates over the top -- 12 percent said they'd be less likely to vote for the GOP ticket without drastic troop reductions.
What does this all mean? First, it tells us that many Americans recognize that there has been genuine progress in bringing some degree of calm to Iraq. Given the endless drumbeat of bad stories and commentary, that is amazing in and of itself. However, the fact that only 49 percent of all Americans agree with the administration's assessment is hardly cause for celebration at the White House.
The fact is, most Americans originally supported the war, later became skeptical and now want our troops back home. It doesn't mean they don't support the troops or the overall cause. Rather, they have grown weary and can no longer distinguish a clear connection between 9/11 and a continued war in Iraq. Clearly there are arguments to support that connection, but if the public cannot make the mental leap needed to do so, then, from a public-opinion basis, the effort is of no value.
And cute tricks, such as having General Petraeus testify one day before the anniversary of 9/11, have little impact on public perception. To many Americans, the election is about Iraq, stupid.
Oddly, my polling tells me that by November of 2008 the issue will be the same that created disaster for the Democrats and Jimmy Carter in 1980 -- the economy. Remember James Carville's stinging slogan for Bill Clinton: "It's the economy, stupid."
Jon Stewart Attempts to "Slay" Food Stamp Fraud Allegations; Misses Real Point | Christine Rousselle
Rand Paul on NSA: “I Believe What You Do on Your Cell Phone is None of Their Damn Business” | Daniel Doherty