Matt Barber

Modern science sometimes serves to validate timeless Biblical truths (not that objective truth needs validating).  Romans 6:23 contains two such truths.  It provides flip sides to a priceless coin, offering us both a blunt warning and an enduring promise: “For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.” 

Far too often we toss this coin, gambling heads-or-tails with our own best interests.  We all sin, but because Christ willingly paid the penalty — suffering death on the cross in our stead — we are redeemed.  We need only believe in Him and the gift of eternal life is ours.  We can confess our sins, repent (which includes making every effort not to repeat those sins) and move on.    

Still, there are those who prefer the tarnished side of the coin to the polished, those who, with haughty hearts and sardonic “pride,” willfully choose sin over Christ; death over life. 

It’s a self-evident reality which is bolstered by medical science, but Scripture additionally reminds us in both the Old and New Testaments that those who choose to engage in homosexual conduct do so at their own peril. 

Consider Romans 1:26-27 (NIV), which a presidential candidate recently referred to as an “obscure passage in Romans”: “Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones.  In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.”  

It’s sad when people yield to disordered sexual temptations that can literally kill them spiritually, emotionally and physically.  Nobody with any compassion enjoys watching others “[receive] in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.”  But a corollary to free will is living (or dying) with the choices we’ve made. 

That said, it’s an entirely different proposition when bad behaviors place others at risk.  This should not — and must not — be “tolerated.”     

Current U.S. health regulations prohibit men who have sex with men (MSM) from donating blood.  Studies conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) categorically confirm that if MSM were permitted to give blood, the general population would be placed at risk.


Matt Barber

Matt Barber is founder and editor-in chief of BarbWire.com. He is an author, columnist, cultural analyst and an attorney concentrating in constitutional law. Having retired as an undefeated heavyweight professional boxer, Matt has taken his fight from the ring to the culture war. (Follow Matt on Twitter: @jmattbarber).