2002: Silent dog, barking dog
12/24/2002 12:00:00 AM - Marvin Olasky
Should we drop the "U" from USA and make the free press of this
country imitate the repressed press of SA, Saudi Arabia? That's what the
Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) sometimes seems to be
suggesting. On Sunday, CAIR "expressed outrage" at a Doug Marlette
syndicated editorial cartoon that portrayed a man in Arab garb driving a
truck carrying a nuclear bomb, with a "What Would Mohammad Drive?" caption.
Message to CAIR: Our press has been showing bias against
Christians for years. Many of us have learned to point it out but hold the
outrage and concentrate on putting out alternative magazines or talk radio
shows -- which happily we can do, because we have a free press. Furthermore,
irritating editorial cartoons are part of our long journalistic tradition.
So CAIR, don't get mad, get even -- by commissioning your own cartoons.
Here's my summary cartoon for 2002: a dog not barking. This
country, despite ourselves, was largely blessed by a return to normality. A
pair of snipers, one with the last name "Muhammad," terrorized the
Washington, D.C., area, but they were apparently responding to their own
inner demons rather than proceeding under direction from an axis of evil
abroad. Deadly terrorism continued in other countries, but the big news in
the United States was no news.
Many questions remain. Did the liberation of Afghanistan, along
with some tightened security at home, disrupt plots that would otherwise
have come to fruition? Are Saddam-associated terrorists lying low so as not
to give the United States more political ammunition for attacking Iraq? Are
we merely in the eye of the storm, with even greater devastation coming? God
knows; we do not.
The good news of no news came despite ourselves. Our airport
screenings of little old ladies have become an international joke. Many of
us still refuse to thank God from whom all blessings flow. But official
discouragement of belief was declining as the end of the year approached.
George W. Bush on Dec. 12 signed an executive order to back up his pledge
that "faith-based programs should not be forced to change their character or
compromise their mission."
That was 2002, a year that began with a whimper, proceeded with
the absence of a big bang and for many Americans was coming to an optimistic
conclusion. North Americans, that is -- because in South America an
irascible old dog, class conflict, was barking.
Argentina suffered riots last week, after another year of
economic crisis that left nearly a quarter of its work force unemployed.
Brazil elected to its presidency Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who ran on a
platform that stressed class conflict rather than reconciliation. The
greatest tumult came in oil-rich Venezuela, where supporters and opponents
of its Marxist would-be dictator, President Hugo Chavez, fought for control.
Does history sadly repeat itself? In Chile three decades ago,
Salvador Allende moved aggressively to take over industries and steal from
the rich property that in some cases their ancestors had probably stolen
from the poor. Two wrongs led to disaster: Chile fell into gridlock and the
military took over, with Allende on Sept. 11, 1973, committing suicide
rather than accepting exile. Thousands of other Chileans died as well, and
the ensuing military dictatorship lasted 15 years.
Sadly, Chavez is showing once again what happens when
politicians, instead of pushing for programs that benefit both rich and poor
and honestly reconcile different classes, emphasize the sword of class
conflict. That's when the dogs of war bark loudly. Yes, we can all get
along, but by telling the truth and then looking for reconciling paths, not
by crying peace, peace when there is no peace.
That's a hard way to go, but it's the right way when dealing
with class differences in South America or religious differences here. Islam
is in part a religion of peace and in part a religion of war, and it's
important -- by means of thoughtful articles but also sassy editorial
cartoons -- to help Americans be aware of both aspects.