Mark Davis

History tells us what has happened in the past. It can guide us through the broad issues of today and teach us how to plot a better tomorrow.

But it does not, it cannot, be of use in telling us who was the aggressor in Sanford, Florida, in February 2012. The false premise of judging current events by past grievances is a nightmare we must escape as a society and as individuals.

The most useful tool I can offer is a turning of the tables in a fashion that might be appreciated by people “honoring” Trayvon and condemning Zimmerman because of a collection of unrelated issues from the past.

Consider a white police officer who has worked an inner-city beat for 10 years. Chances are he has witnessed a long succession of arrests of black men for a variety of crimes.

Today, he sees a young black man driving a Mercedes SUV in a high-crime part of town. Concluding this must be the result of an auto theft, he stops the man and questions him without one shred of probable cause.

This would be recognized as blatant prejudice today, filed under the contrived offense of “driving while black.” People of all colors would realize that this cop should not project guilt onto this driver just because he’s busted hundreds of guys like him in past years.

Nor should anyone lunge toward innocence for Trayvon and guilt for Zimmerman because of past (or even current) examples of blacks hurt by white racism.

It is an assault on logic, clarity and objectivity and worse, it sets us back in our quest for further racial progress.

It cannot be a good thing for the black community to harbor suspicions of white folks today because of things done by others through history. And it has not been helpful for whites to see troublemakers like Al Sharpton trying to lure black America to his baseless, hateful cause of stoking this verdict for his own narcissist satisfaction.

I replayed multiple times the YouTube video of NBA veteran and analyst Charles Barkley accepting the verdict and decrying how clumsy things get when the media prod us into racial discord. I revisited it not because it was so great to have a famous black man agree with me; it gave me hope that we may be able to gently dissuade those who would drag “history” into places where it does not apply.

At some point someday, a truly bad white person will shoot a truly innocent black kid. When that happens, I will join the lament of such a horrible act. I will not be restrained in my proper reaction because of high Afircan-American crime rates or because my Uncle Frank was mugged by a black guy in 1972.

If we can all get a grip on what history does and does not tell us, we might actually be able to make some progress.