Hamilton also issued a series of rulings for over seven years that prevented the state of Indiana from enforcing its informed-consent law. Yet, while that law was virtually identical to a Pennsylvania statute the Supreme Court had already upheld in an earlier case, Judge Hamilton ignored the precedent in order to advance his biased personal views. But that’s not news.
Even before being a judge, Hamilton had shown his true activist colors as a board member of the Indiana chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and as a fundraiser for the discredited liberal activist group ACORN.
Ah, there it is, the media will surely cover this because of all the scandals in which ACORN has been involved recently. Oh wait. They’ve not even covered those. … Never mind.
Judge Hamilton has the credentials of a liberal activist, not an impartial judge, and he should not be getting a promotion. That should be news.