In America, this kind of deep support is becoming rarer. In 1989, 69 percent of Americans supported Israel. In the latest ABC News poll, just 41 percent of Americans do. And the really weird thing is, as New York magazine put it, "Even more unnerving for liberal Jews here (in New York) has been the fact that sympathy for Israel is strongest among Republicans. At 64 percent, they are far beyond Democrats, only 38 percent of whom sympathize with the Israelis." Columnist Zev Chafets explains the results this way: "Israel's base is now located in pro-American hawks or conservatives or Jews. Some Jews don't feel comfortable with Jerry Falwell, but that's too bad."
How to explain American support for Israel? Like Desmond Tutu, many people abroad aggressively blame the alleged power of something called the Jewish lobby (in a democracy in which Jews are just 2 percent or so of the population). Meanwhile, Islam, designated representative of Third World culture oppressed by evil Western patriarchy, has become the new darling of the liberal intelligentsia.
In PC-Speak, international alliances are supposed to be defined in rational, secular terms. We support Israel because Israel is a democracy, which is true, but so are a lot of other countries. We support Israel because Israel is a staunch ally. Which is true, but what does it get us? With allies like this, America hardly needs enemies. No, support for Israel cannot be justified by the cold logic of national self-interest. And it cannot be explained away by calling some people hawks. Both sides in this conflict use force of arms. A generalized willingness to use military force does not explain why Americans are still much more likely to identify with Israel than, say, the Palestinian authority.
Maggie Gallagher is a nationally syndicated columnist, a leading voice in the new marriage movement and co-author of The Case for Marriage: Why Married People Are Happier, Healthier, and Better Off Financially.