What about North Korea and Iran?
Former Clinton Secretary of Labor Robert Reich, who recently appeared on the Sean Hannity radio show, asked this question. Reich complained about what he called the Bush administration's misplaced priority on Iraq. After all, he argued, North Korea and Iran pose a greater threat to our national security.
Hannity tried to explain that, in a post 9-11 world, and in view of Iraq's refusal to obey United Nations resolutions, the country could ill afford to ignore the threat posed by a possible Iraqi use of chemical, biological, and perhaps nuclear weapons. Reich countered, but North Korea possesses nukes now . What does the administration propose to do about that?
The Bush administration quite correctly points out that North Korea presents an even greater threat to her neighbors . Accordingly, Bush demanded that any talks with North Korea include the countries most directly threatened -- South Korea, Japan, China and Russia. North Korea's Kim Jong Il, however, insisted on talks only with the United States, and objected to the administration's demand to include her neighbors.
Reich's attack on Bush's policy toward North Korea showed the typical cheekiness of the Bill Clinton administration. Clinton, remember, famously negotiated an "end" to the North Korean nuclear program. In 1994, former President Jimmy Carter went to North Korea, as Carter later wrote in an editorial, " . . . with the approval of President Bill Clinton . . . " to encourage North Korea to end its program. North Korea agreed to do so in exchange for assistance in providing regular fuel oil shipments and in the construction of two light-water nuclear reactors. These "successful" talks led, in part, to Carter's receiving the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002.
Unfortunately, days after the announcement of Carter's Peace Prize, North Korea publicly admitted that it never ended its nuclear program, and that the country intends to continue it.
So Reich criticizes Bush for standing firm in the face of Iraq's history of lies and deceit, but assigns no blame to Clinton for his naivete in accepting North Korea's pledge at face value. Does Reich not understand that North Korea indeed poses a dangerous and complex problem because it now "possesses" nuclear weapons -- a situation, in the case of Iraq, Bush avoided with the American-led coalition that toppled Saddam Hussein's regime?
Days after Reich asked, "What about North Korea?" North Korea blinked. Despite repeated refusals, North Korea agreed to expanded talks with the United States, South Korea, Japan, China and Russia.
Special Agent and Whistleblower Vince Cefalu's Trial Against ATF For Retaliation Starts Monday | Katie Pavlich
House Republican: If Tahmooressi Isn’t Released, Mexico Will No Longer Be Treated as our Friend | Amanda Muñoz