A few points must be conceded to Kerry. There was no thunderbolt from Rome about denying Communion to pro-choice politicians, though some news media seemed to think so. The Vatican statement by Cardinal Francis Arinze was an off-the-cuff remark, referring to ?unambiguously pro-abortion? Catholic politicians. Whatever one thinks of ?personally opposed? pro-choice politicians like Kerry, it?s a stretch to argue that they ?unambiguously? favor abortion. In addition, the Catholic Church has procedures for denying Communion. Bishops are supposed to discuss their objections with the person involved, then make an effort to understand his thinking and inform him in writing if a sanction is being imposed. It?s not clear that the Communion-denying bishops followed this procedure.
Yet, it?s easy to understand the frustration of the bishops. They have been saying the same thing to Catholic politicians for many years, with no result. They don?t understand why a Congress that contains so many Catholics can?t shake the stranglehold of the abortion lobby (I don?t understand it either). NARAL Pro-Choice America and the National Organization for Women are surely the most radical abortion groups on the planet. Their positions, such as backing ?partial-birth? abortion, go way beyond what the American people are prepared to support. Yet Catholic pols seem impotent on the issue. Some, like Kerry, appear at NARAL conventions, egging the activists on with ?we must take this issue to the people? rhetoric.
Kerry even voted to allow pregnant girls to be whisked across state lines to get an abortion, thus evading state law. Odds are he would have voted no if the bill had been about taking young girls to a dentist without a parent?s knowledge. Why do Catholic pols behave so oddly on abortion? Is it because they have no real grasp of their own religion, or is it that they are simply terrified by the abortion lobby? Probably both, with emphasis on the latter. The abortion lobby made an example of Pennsylvania Gov. Robert Casey in 1992. Casey was a great governor, liberal on every issue of interest to Democrats except abortion. So he was pointedly banned from speaking at the 1992 convention. To rub it in, one of his most bitter opponents in Pennsylvania, a pro-abortion Republican, was given a speaking role. The liberal Village Voice was so upset by the crass treatment that it offered Casey a forum in New York. But he was drowned out by an alliance of abortion-rights supporters and free-Mumia leftists.
Presumably the Kennedys and Kerrys remember the Casey lesson. Such is the culture of the Democratic Party today. And there are no important Democratic Catholic pols willing to stand against it.
NYT Journalist Wonders: "Free Speech Aside" Why Would Anyone Hold A Contest to Draw Muhammed? | Katie Pavlich