More than five years after the far-reaching education reform legislation became law, Congressman Scott Garrett (R-NJ) is fighting back over renewal of the bill to ensure that no child is really left behind.
Garrett, who noted in a recent interview with me that a blanket renewal of the “No Child Left Behind” law “as is” would be a “disservice”, is gearing up for a possible fight with the leader of his own party in this major domestic debate.
In January of 2002, President Bush, then twelve months into his first term in office, signed into law the sweeping education reform bill, “No Child Left Behind”. The White House fact sheet called it “the most sweeping reform of federal education policy in a generation” noting that “[T]he legislation, which closely follows the Presidents agenda to improve America’s public schools, passed Congress with overwhelming bipartisan majorities” The bill, NCLB for short, ultimately created a federal power for those in Washington D.C. to set education standards and accountability for the entire country. Now, less than eighteen months before a new president will be sworn in, the “No Child Left Behind Act” is coming up for renewal in the Congress, where members of both parties have taken issue with the law.
Congressman Garrett, currently in his third term from the 5th District of New Jersey, says the bill takes control away from parents and teachers in defining education policies and standards, and gives that power to bureaucrats in Washington D.C. The criticism of NCLB, he stated in a recent interview, is universal with all fifty states having taken some action against the original bill. But instead of eliminating the bill, Congressman Garrett has endorsed what he refers to as a “modest proposal.” That modest proposal, entitled the LEARN Act, an amendment to NCLB that Garrett is sponsoring, would give states a chance to opt out of NCLB and set education standards and policy on a state level, while still receiving federal funds from the government in the form of a tax credit.
According to a statement from Garrett’s office, “[T]he LEARN Act… gives states the ability to opt out of NCLB and provides residents of those states a tax credit equal to the amount that they would have otherwise received in federal funding. This gives control back to the states, allowing them to pursue local and state educational initiatives based on what they believe will best help their students.” (It should be noted that another proposed amendment to the NCLB bill titled the A-plus Act would work in a similar fashion, although that bill would give states funding through block grants while the LEARN Act would give individuals back the money through tax credits.)
Yikes: New Hampshire Democrat Holds Pro-Abortion Rally in Front of Halloween Decorations Portraying Death | Katie Pavlich