Joel Mowbray

In the first of its kind for an event organized by a major national Muslim organization, Kamal Nawash and the Free Muslims Coalition (FMC) recently held the Free Muslims March Against Terrorism.  Not surprisingly, the leaders of every other major Muslim organization shunned the march and declined to take a public stand against terrorism and extremism.

Noticeably missing from the list of over 80 sponsors Nawash rounded up was any of the Muslim groups that claim to be moderates, such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC).  Though these groups pay lip service to opposing terrorism, they couldn?t put their money where their mouth is and bring themselves to stand side-by-side with the Free Muslim Coalition.

The reasons for the absence of the major national Muslim groups are obvious.  The empirical evidence has clearly demonstrated where the true loyalties of organizations such as CAIR and MPAC lie.  In this particular case, it is anathema for many Muslim groups to identify themselves with these unambiguous message of the rally.  Nawash is among the few Muslim leaders?and certainly one of the very few leaders of the overtly political Muslim groups?to explicitly confront the real threat, the real root cause of terrorism: radical Islam.

Where most prominent Muslim leaders prefer ambiguity and moral equivalence, Nawash stakes out an unmistakable position not only opposing just violent jihad, but the doctrines of Wahhabism and political Islam as well.  Nawash is, without exception, against the creation of Islamic states?anywhere. The other major Islamic organizations simply can?t take this position.  Their refusal to back even Nawash?s message exposes their true sympathies.

See no evil
If other Muslim groups could even go as far as condemning specific acts of Islamic terror, that would be a step in Nawash?s direction. But organizations such as CAIR, for instance, have pointedly refused to condemn Islamic terrorist organizations, such as Hamas and Hezbollah, or even specific Islamic terrorist attacks.  The best example of the latter occurred after the murder, burning, stoning, and mutilation of four American contractors in Fallujah.  CAIR only condemned the mutilation as contrary to Islam, but did not condemn specifically the murder, burning, or stoning of the men?a position that was also taken by a leading Fallujah cleric.


Joel Mowbray

Joel Mowbray, who got his start with Townhall.com, is an award-winning investigative journalist, nationally-syndicated columnist and author of Dangerous Diplomacy: How the State Department Threatens America's Security.

Be the first to read Joel Mowbray's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.