The Audacity to Be Black and Conservative
2/26/2002 12:00:00 AM - Joel Mowbray
This afternoon, Sen. Ted Kennedy and his Democrat cronies on the
Senate Education Committee may put their liberal racism on display once
again at the confirmation hearing of Gerald Reynolds, whom President
George W. Bush nominated to head of the Office of Civil Rights at the
Department of Education. Reynolds' crime? He has the audacity to be
both black and conservative, a mortal sin in the eyes of Kennedy and
Company.
Reynolds has waited patiently for the better part of a year for the
opportunity to respond to the often-ludicrous attacks that have been
lodged against him. Critics have brazenly attempted to smear him by
distorting his record, even resorting to outright fabrications. In the
end, however, the charges won't stick because Reynolds is too thoughtful
and articulate to be reduced to a mere caricature.
So-called civil rights groups have primarily assailed Reynolds for his
supposed opposition to affirmative action. But Reynolds supports
affirmative action, just not racial preferences. When I interned at the
Center for Equal Opportunity, he was the first person to teach me the
crucial distinction. Affirmative action, he noted, was originally
intended to increase recruitment of minorities but had been bastardized
by the left, becoming a racial spoils system that perpetuates
race-consciousness.
Reynolds' position is not extreme in the least. He supports President
Bush's plans for affirmative access and outreach to expand opportunities
for minorities in educational admissions. His views are actually in
sync with the mainstream of public opinion. Americans inherently want
fairness, which is the essence of Reynolds' belief system. True
affirmative action promotes opportunity while still embracing
colorblindness, whereas racial preferences treat people differently
according to color of skin, while having the unintended consequence of
stigmatizing beneficiaries.
Realizing that attacks on affirmative action grounds would not be
enough to sink the nomination, opponents have enlisted the help of
feminists by setting up a straw woman over Title IX, which mandates
gender-equality in athletics. Last summer, Kennedy's office put out the
word that Reynolds opposes Title IX and would "soften" enforcement, even
though Reynolds has never said anything publicly on the issue. In fact,
from past conversations I have had with him, I have every reason to
believe he would fulfill his duty to uphold existing law.
Considering that opponents have to stoop to making up charges out of
whole cloth, one has to wonder, what's the real reason leftists are
targeting Reynolds? He is a victim of what Supreme Court Justice
Clarence Thomas once dubbed "the new intolerance," the attempt to
castigate and ultimately silence any black American who dissents from
the traditional civil rights establishment. Reynolds stirs up so much
resentment because he dares to stray from the leftist orthodoxy that all
people of color must hew to the liberal line.
It is a testament to Reynolds' strength of character that he has
steadfastly refused to allow leftist elites to define, intimidate, or
silence him. But this refusal is precisely what makes him such an
anathema to Kennedy and his minions.
Liberalism is the last refuge of racist scoundrels. It focuses solely
on skin color, to the exclusion of all other human characteristics. No
matter what someone of color has accomplished, he or she is still
classified first and foremost as a member of a racial group.
Depending on which minority group to which one belongs, the left
expects, no demands, that that person conform to a predetermined,
monolithic worldview. But Reynolds does not fit the stereotypes upon
which leftist philosophy is based, which is why leftists, white and
black alike, deem him to be a traitor to his own race by virtue of his
conservative beliefs. It's a shame that opponents are so blinded by
their contempt for what Reynolds represents that they have failed to see
the person he is.
Reynolds is a skilled attorney, who has experience both in private
practice and public policy. As legal counsel for Center for Equal
Opportunity, he exposed the race-conscious admission policies at various
universities. As president of Center for New Black Leadership, he
strongly advocated community-based affirmative action that helps people
in need, without regard for color of skin. As a person, Reynolds is an
"education father," with a 7-year-old daughter in a charter school and a
wife who heads up the parents' association.
If Senate Democrats can look past Reynolds' skin color and grant him a
fair hearing, they will undoubtedly vote to confirm him because of his
impressive track record and immense talent. The real question is will
they?