Mr. Conda then moves to Mayor Giuliani’s support of the extension of the Bush tax cuts, pointing out that all the major Republican candidates agree on this issue. Which may be true—today. But Mitt Romney refused to support the Bush tax cuts in 2003, when the President needed that help. When it counted the most, Mitt Romney stood with Ted Kennedy and not the President. Talk about someone’s actions casting “doubt on his commitment to the low-tax, economic conservatism that have been a basic pillar of the Republican Party since Ronald Reagan”--while that very Republican Party was whipping support for the most important conservative economic initiative since Reagan resided at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Romney chose to abandon pro-growth principles and the conservatives who have long fought for them. Clearly, Mr. Romney’s instincts lead him first to the position of political expediency, and not always the position of economic prosperity.
Rudy Giuliani is the proven fiscal conservative running for President. He doesn’t need to speak in abstracts and theoreticals, and he doesn’t need to obscure his record with attacks on his opponent. Why? Because he has actively and effectively governed as a conservative, and that’s exactly how he’ll govern as President. Rudy has seen what real pro-growth policies, and the determination to get them implemented, can do to benefit the people he serves. The same can’t be said for Mr. Romney—or, unfortunately for them, the people of Massachusetts.
Joe Lhota served as New York City’s deputy mayor for operations (1998 - 2001) and budget director (1995 – 1999) during the administration of Mayor Rudy Giuliani.
Bernie Sanders Champions YUGE Profits for U.S. Corporations (But Only in Cahoots with Communists) | Humberto Fontova