This is part of a series that Townhall.com's National Political Reporter Jillian Bandes is doing on electorally vulnerable Democrats called "Open Season."
Betsey Markey had an interesting week.
The freshman Democratic Congressman from Colorado reported a whopping $505,000 haul for the first quarter of her campaign, earning her a front-page profile on the Washington Post on Monday. On Wednesday, she held an hour-long tele-town hall, confirming that she was solidly in campaign mode after a month of hard voting.
She’s probably right to step up the campaign mode, because her votes were indeed hard. Markey was one of only eight Democratic Congressmen who flipped their votes on Obamacare from "no" to "yes" after Obama twisted their arms the second time around.
Markey claims her come-again was because the health care bill reduces the deficit.
"The clincher was the CBO score,” she told the Post.
Andrew Moylan, Director of Government Affairs at the National Taxpayers Union, called that logic “absurd.”
“That’s a ridiculous claim, because everyone knows that that CBO score was gamed within an inch of its life,” said Moylan. “They basically created a bill with several things that they knew would never actually happen, that provide savings, like cuts in reimbursements to doctors, that they claimed would reduce the deficit.”
The Post also reported on Markey’s favorable reception in her home district during the Easter recess, gloating over her prospects like a child in a toy store. Local media had also written favorable reviews of her come-again vote. But Markey’s almost-certain Republican opponent, Cory Gardner, says that Markey should probably think twice before doing the happy dance.
“As far as the numbers go, $355,000 out of her $505,000 came after she decided to change her vote on health care. What’s curious to me is exactly where the money’s coming from,” said Zach Lahn, the deputy campaign manager for Gardner's campaign. “After her ‘aye’ card check vote, she saw a huge influx of money from out of state. And we’re expecting that trend to continue.”
Losing Jobs Over Ex-Im’s Expiration? Don’t Believe ItLosing Jobs Over Ex-Im’s Expiration? Don’t Believe It | Ed Feulner