It is a critical step forward to undoing ObamaCare.
The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals today declared the individual mandate, the provision forcing Americans to purchase health insurance, unconstitutional.
In a split decision, posted here, the court found that "the individual mandate contained in the Act exceeds Congress's enumerated commerce power."
"What Congress cannot do under the Commerce Clause is mandate that individuals enter into contracts with private insurance companies for the purchase of an expensive product from the time they are born until the time they die," the opinion said. The 2-1 ruling marks the first time a judge appointed by a Democrat has voted to strike down the mandate. Judge Frank Hull, who was nominated by former President Bill Clinton, joined Chief Judge Joel Dubina, who was appointed by George H.W. Bush, to strike down the mandate. Judge Stanley Marcus, in a dissenting opinion, said the mandate is constitutional. He was also appointed by Clinton. The ACLJ's summary of the 11th Circuit's opinion is posted here.
The court concluded:
This economic mandate represents a wholly novel and potentially unbounded assertion of congressional authority: the ability to compel Americans to purchase an expensive health insurance product they have elected not to buy, and to make them re-purchase that insurance product every month for their entire lives.
We agree. This is the argument we made in our amicus brief that we filed in this case on behalf of 74 Members of Congress and more than 70,000 Americans. Our amicus brief is posted here.
While the appeals court did not declare the entire law unconstitutional, by striking the individual mandate, the entire law is clearly in jeopardy. The individual mandate is such a core provision of ObamaCare, that without it, it's very difficult to see how this law can be salvaged.
DOJ Monitored Phone Lines of Five Fox News Reporters, Fox News Executives and Family Members of Reporters | Katie Pavlich
Whoa: US Hasn't Detained Five Benghazi Terrorists Due to Trial-Related Evidentiary Concerns | Guy Benson