James J. Kilpatrick

The facts in the case of Weldon Angelos are not in dispute: He really did sell 24 ounces of marijuana to an informant, and he really did carry a handgun when he did it.

The story can be summarized in a paragraph. Four years ago, Angelos' former girlfriend informed federal agents that he was selling drugs at an address in Salt Lake City. Through an undercover agent, officers staged three separate buys of marijuana, then obtained a warrant for Angelos' arrest. They seized $18,000 in cash and five handguns.

Indicted on four felony counts and two lesser charges, Angelos declined the prosecutor's bargain offer of 15 years and out. When he refused to plea, federal prosecutors piled on 16 additional counts. Found guilty by a jury, he was sentenced in November 2004 to 55 years and a day in a federal prison. This past January a panel of the 10th U.S. Circuit unanimously affirmed that sentence. He filed his appeal in the U.S. Supreme Court six weeks ago. If he is required to serve his full term, he will be free soon after his 82nd birthday.

The question he has asked the high court to hear is not whether his punishment fits within Chapter 18 of the U.S. Code. It fits. He asks whether it fits within the Eighth Amendment: Is it both cruel and unusual? More tellingly, I would ask, is it just? District Judge Paul G. Cassell, who presided over the jury trial, felt strongly that the long prison term could not be justified, but under federal sentencing guidelines, he had no choice but to impose it.

In a written opinion, Judge Cassell sympathetically identified Angelos as a first offender, a successful music executive with two young children. "To sentence him to prison for the rest of his life is unjust, cruel and even irrational." A fair sentence, he thought, would have been two years for the firearm he carried and six years for the marijuana. His post-trial poll of the jurors found them a little tougher: They would have sentenced Angelos to a median term of 15 years.

In an extensive appendix, the judge noted that the sentence imposed on the defendant for possessing the guns was longer than he would have received for hijacking an airplane or raping a 10-year-old child. The terrorist who is convicted of detonating a bomb in a public place and killing a bystander can expect less than 20 years.

James J. Kilpatrick

James J. Kilpatrick has been reporter, editor, columnist, commentator, and briefly an adjunct professor of journalism.

Be the first to read James Kilpatrick's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.