“Coyotes are spurring on migrants by putting out the word that pregnant women and unaccompanied minors are treated more leniently and allowed to stay in the United States, although the Obama administration insists they will be returned home…[A teacher in Guatemala] said parents pulled 22 children aged 5 to 14 out of the school between February and May, all bound for the United States.”
When so-called immigration reform advocates tout lenient immigration policy as “compassionate,” they ignore the realities of the process. Children and adults who make the journey to the Rio Grande, largely on foot, are often malnourished and dehydrated by the time they arrive. Some never make it at all; the body of an 11-year-old discovered in June in Hidalgo County, Texas, was just one of many. Mass graves have been unearthed in rural areas, just miles from the Mexican border. Neither do those who survive the journey arrive unscathed; it is not uncommon for unaccompanied children to face sexual assault and beatings.
The Americans who will bear the brunt of the influx of illegal immigrants over our southern border are not the policy makers in Washington or the supposedly compassionate elites in New York or San Francisco. It is mostly Latino communities that will be exposed to communicable diseases and crime as more and more unscreened individuals make their way into the general population.
Furthermore, lower income Americans will find entitlement benefits strained, as programs like food stamps and subsidized housing are forced to stretch to cover millions of new recipients. Tragically, the American Federal government cannot effectively care for all the world’s poor. If it could, we should be sending boats and planes to rescue the millions of children in South America, Africa and Southeast Asia who face conditions equal to or worse than those in Central America.
At this point, I think it is fair to ask the question if greater fencing along our southern border would be more compassionate than a porous, understaffed border which entices desperate people to take fatal risks with themselves and their children. Fences have worked for Israel, which shares a border with neighbors far more hostile than ours, and as some pundits have pointed out, there is a fence around the White House. When we send mixed signals to the world about our intention to enforce our immigration laws, we encourage false rumors, empower coyotes, and put millions of lives in jeopardy.
Bishop Harry Jackson is chairman of the High Impact Leadership Coalition and senior pastor of Hope Christian Church in Beltsville, MD, and co-authored, Personal Faith, Public Policy [FrontLine; March 2008] with Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council.