The conservative duo dismissed arguments advanced in recent days by some fellow Republicans that earmarking is a relatively insignificant issue, and that the GOP shouldn’t cede all the ground on specific directing of appropriations to Democrats and the White House. “Earmarks are the cause of bigger problems,” DeMint explained. “They keep members' eyes off the ball of major reforms. [Rejecting] earmarks is a way for us to show that we've gotten the message, and that we’re committed to stop focusing on parochial and special interests. It's not our job to be directing money back to local projects that don’t have national significance," he said. It now appears that GOP brass has adopted a similar stance.
“Our country is facing the greatest difficulty of my lifetime,” Coburn said. “For us to defend a process that takes the focus off the important issues is an untenable position. It violates our oath, which says we must do what's in the best interests of the nation, not what’s in the best interest of individual members’ political careers.” He added that maintaining the status quo on earmarks would engender “greater cynicism” among the American people “at a time when they need encouragement.” A source in McConnell’s office agreed, saying that the GOP leader’s announcement would “help bring folks on our side together.”
Prior to the McConnell development, DeMint predicted that his proposal would narrowly pass. Based on his own informal whip count, DeMint said he believed his faction would have the votes to adopt the moratorium. “I think we have the edge by a vote or two,” he said. After McConnell’s chess move, those calculations are now moot, as the conference’s adoption of the moratorium is a fait accompli.
McConnell’s decision also sidestepped a number of potentially thorny issues brewing within his caucus. Senator-elect Mike Lee of Utah was pushing a public vote on the matter, and the DeMint/Coburn duo was preparing to force an open, Senate-wide vote on earmarks by attaching it to a food safety bill on Wednesday. The Party’s official change of heart effectively neutralizes both possibilities. United Senate Republicans now plan to pressure Democratic colleagues to endorse their position; a choice that could prove complicated for a handful of Senators widely viewed to be vulnerable in 2012.
Must Watch: Senator Explains Why He Changed From Being a Democrat to Being a Republican | Katie Pavlich
Can the David of Swiss Human Rights Withstand the Goliath of IRS Extraterritorial Tax Enforcement? | Daniel J. Mitchell