George Will
WASHINGTON--``Surtout, Messieurs, point de zele,'' said Talleyrand, expressing the sensibility of conservatism. His wisdom--``Above all, gentlemen, no zeal''--is unintelligible to some profoundly unconservative conservatives who advocate madly multiplying honors for Ronald Reagan. How many ways are there to show misunderstanding of Reagan's spirit? Let us count the zealots' ways. Not content with seeing Reagan's name attached to Washington's National Airport and to Washington's second (to the Pentagon) largest building and to an aircraft carrier, some people want--seriously--some sort of Reagan honor in all 3,141 American counties. But their immediate battle--America's greatest battles: Saratoga, Gettysburg, and the National Airport Metro Station--is to get Congress to compel administrators of the Washington area Metro to add Reagan's name to the sign at the airport station, which now reads: ``National Airport.'' Those ardent to add Reagan's name to that sign say they are not--Heaven forfend!--scoring ideological points, they are practicing compassionate conservatism. They tell of confused travelers who, because Reagan's name is not on the sign, have not realized that the airport is that big structure adjacent to the above-ground Metro station. Please. Travelers too oblivious to know they are at an airport when large, clear signs say they are? They should be given those little plastic pilot wings that are issued to unaccompanied children, and taken into protective custody. The conservatives want to get Congress to order Metro officials to spend several hundred thousand dollars to add Reagan's name to the station signs and all references to the station on maps. But usually it is (BEG ITAL)liberals who, explaining the need for everyone to be supervised by liberals, assert or imply that the average American is dimwitted. Now come conservatives, asserting the need to help Americans who do not know when they are at a clearly marked airport. Besides, Reagan had a memorable thing or two to say about bossy federal institutions meddling in local affairs. Advocates of Reagan idolatry want to worsen the increasing clutter on Washington's Mall by putting a Reagan memorial there. One of the world's greatest public places is becoming a manifestation of the entitlement mentality, contested ground for groups claiming they are entitled to have their achievements (e.g., World War II veterans) or beliefs (Reaganites) ratified in stone on the Mall. Fortunately, in 1986, Reagan signed a law stipulating that no individual will be honored on the Mall until 25 years after his or her death. Political freedom implies freedom from political propaganda--from being incessantly bombarded by government-imposed symbols and messages intended to shape public consciousness in conformity with a contemporary agenda. Such bombardment is unquestionably the aim of some Reaganite monument-mongers. They have the mentality that led to the lunatic multiplication of Lenin portraits, busts and statues throughout the Evil Empire. Very different impulses, disconnected from immediate agendas, led to the building of the Washington Monument, the Lincoln Memorial and the Jefferson Memorial, which were begun in 1848, 1915 and 1938 respectively, long after the men honored had receded from immediate partisan relevance. Not content with turning the Mall into a battlefield for endless contention between ideological factions, they want to do the same to the currency. They advocate putting Reagan in place of Alexander Hamilton on the $10 bill. But Hamilton may already be the Founder least sufficiently honored with public memorials. More than any other Founder, he imagined America's future as an industrious, entrepreneurial nation of vigor, strength, prosperity, growth and social mobility--that is, the America Reagan celebrated. Reagan's misguided worshipers are guilty of ``value subtraction.'' Economists used that concept to denote one of the miracles of Soviet communism: that system could take leather, cloth, rubber and thread and produce shoes worth less than the materials of which the shoes were made. Reagan's idolaters are achieving something similar by their mishandling of the elements of his significance, not least of all his modesty suited to the leader of a republic. What would Reagan in his prime have made of the incontinent lust of a Washington-based coterie to celebrate him? That may be surmised from one of his favorite maxims: There are no limits to what can be accomplished if you do not care who gets the credit. In this, Reagan was Roman--or at least like one Roman. Although Cato had served the Roman Republic with distinction, no statue had been erected to him, and someone asked him why. His serene answer was that it was better to have that question asked than the question, Why (BEG ITAL)have they erected a statue to Cato? No one asks such a question about Reagan, which in fact is a kind of monument to him.

George Will

George F. Will is a 1976 Pulitzer Prize winner whose columns are syndicated in more than 400 magazines and newspapers worldwide.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read George Will's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.


TOWNHALL MEDIA GROUP