Moyers was a gifted understudy of his old boss, Lyndon Johnson, and though he affected piety wherever he went, there was always a whiff of the thug about his person. How well I recall the revelations of the journalist Andrew Ferguson, demonstrating that while an independent contractor of PBS the Rev. Moyers made a fortune. Well, his old boss made a fortune, too, while working for the government. Why should the Rev. Moyers not do equally well while working for an organization that at least had a parasite's attachment to the federal milch cow? After Ferguson's revelations appeared in The New Republic, Moyers harassed him -- another page torn from Lyndon's playbook!
Yet Moyers is going quietly into the good night. Rather is leaving indignantly and beclouded by scandal -- another scandal, I might add, that would not exist if the liberals of the dominant media culture would simply admit that they are liberals, that they have a liberal bias, and that having a bias is normal for journalists and need not cause them to practice deceit.
Of course, in practice many of these liberals do practice deceit. In the case of Rather, he and his associates at CBS aired a phony story about the president's National Guard service.
Whether they knew it was a deceit or not, I cannot say -- but surely in their cover-up they recognized their deceitfulness. Surely they knew they were stretching the truth when they claimed that the phony documents they relied on to support their phony story were provided by "unimpeachable sources."
Those "sources" ended up being but one source, Bill Burckett. And who is he? Burckett is a well-known anti-Bush obsessive. Yet maybe Rather and his colleagues considered Burckett more than one person, and maybe his very obsessiveness rendered him unimpeachable in their eyes.
Now in unveiling its 224-page report of Rather's faulty work, CBS admits that the Rather story was unfair and inaccurate, but there is a new deceit. The report claims that there is no "basis" for adjudging the existence of "political bias" in Rather's shabby journalism. Well, as the shrinks are given to saying, "If it's true for you, it's true for you."
The fact, long established by media pollsters, is that major media are as dominated by the so-called liberal point of view as are our universities. I say "so-called liberal point of view" because the modern liberal is not very liberal, after all. Neither tolerance nor love of liberty characterizes the point of view of the contemporary liberal, merely conformity. The liberal point of view is a conformist point of view. What it conforms to changes year in and year out, but one thing it always stands by is the demand for rank-and-file conformity. Oh yes, and it demands one more thing: deceit.
The conformists at CBS have since Rather's embarrassing report on the president demonstrated that they are entoiled to the ethical standards of the liberals' leading ethicist of the last half of the 20th century, Alger Hiss. Hiss is the master who first demonstrated that the moral high ground could be attained merely by lying, imperturbably lying, sempiternally lying. Through every revelation against you, lie. As the evidence against you mounts, lie. Even if the DNA analysis -- say the DNA found on a dress purchased from The Gap -- discredits your testimony, lie.
So it appears that Rather continues to deceive. It appears that CBS continues to deceive. Nonetheless, it really does not matter all that much. Rather is leaving. CBS has slipped so far in the polls that it seems its news reports are only watched by liberals and ignoramuses. And cable provides increasingly the kind of diversity that intelligent viewers seek